Consafe Engineering (UK) Ltd v Emtunga UK Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Electromagnetic Geoservices Asa (a company incorporated under the laws of Norway) v Petroleum Geo-Services Asa (a company incorporated under the laws of Norway) and Others
...modelling should be the subject of the regime for Notices of Experiments and the judge gave directions on that basis. In any event in Consafe v Emtunga [1999] RPC 154 (paragraph 16) Pumfrey J held that the procedure for Notices of Experiments should be used for the sort of finite element an......
-
Molnlycke Health Care AB v Brightwake Ltd
...rules. 3 The rule uses the word "must". It is mandatory. 4 Two cases have a bearing on the issue that arises before me. The first is Consafe v Emtunga [1999] RPC 154. In that case Pumfrey J was dealing with the question of what an experiment was. He held that a finite element analysis was a......
-
Gareth Kevin Glass and Others v freyssinet Ltd
...parties and must do its best to arrive at the correct construction irrespective of either or both side's preference, see Consafe Engineering (UK) Ltd v Emtunga UK Ltd [1999] R.P.C. 154, at [21]. In Scanvaegt International A/S v Pelcombe Limited [1998] F.S.R. 786 Aldous LJ, with whom Henry L......
-
Starsight Telecast Inc. and Another v Virgin Media Ltd and Others
...the documents referred to in paragraph 6.1(1)(a); …" 7 As Pumfrey J observed in relation to a predecessor of this rule in Consafe Engineering (UK) Ltd v Emtunga UK Ltd [1999] RPC 154 at [23] (emphasis added): "A product description is normally prepared by the defendant to the allegation of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
INTERPRETING PATENT CLAIMS: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE UK KIRIN-AMGEN DECISION
...v Anderson (1894) 11 RPC 519 at 523. 44 David Bainbridge, Intellectual Property (Pearson Education Limited, 5th Ed, 2002) at p 398. 45 [1999] RPC 154 at [9]. 46 [1999] RPC 135 at 143. 47 Mario Franzosi, “Equivalence in Europe”[2003] EIPR 237 at 238. 48 A different view seems to have been ta......