Conway v Rimmer
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Year | 1968 |
| Date | 1968 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
185 cases
- R Rama Chandran v Industrial Court of Malaysia and Another
- Zainuddin Dato Seri Paduka Hj Marsal v Pengiran Putera Negara Pengiran Hj Umar Pengiran Datu Penghulu Pg Hj Apong and Another
-
Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
...form asked, should be ordered, provided the documents were otherwise liable to production (post, pp. 578G-579A). Conway v. Rimmer [1968] A.C. 910, H.L.(E.) applied. (2) That although in general no independent action for discovery lay against a person against whom no reasonable cause of acti......
-
Norwich Pharmacal Company v Commissioners of Customs and Excise
...purpose - and the Courts ought not to compel the Customs to break that confidence. That principle was stated by Lord Reid in Conway v. Riminer and another (1968). C. at page 946, when he 16"If the State insists on a man disclosing his private affairs for a particular purpose, it requires a ......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
...2010 SCC 23, [2010], Montréal (City) v. 2952‑1366 Québec Inc., 2005 SCC 62, Carey v. Ontario, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 637, Conway v. Rimmer, [1968] A.C. 910 (H.L.), Ontario (Ministry of Finance) (Re), [2017] O.I.P.C. No. 58, Greater Sudbury (City) (Re), [2013] O.I.P.C. No. 254, North Bay (City) (Re......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 24-28, 2022)
...2010 SCC 23, [2010], Montréal (City) v. 2952‑1366 Québec Inc., 2005 SCC 62, Carey v. Ontario, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 637, Conway v. Rimmer, [1968] A.C. 910 (H.L.), Ontario (Ministry of Finance) (Re), [2017] O.I.P.C. No. 58, Greater Sudbury (City) (Re), [2013] O.I.P.C. No. 254, North Bay (City) (Re......
3 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...see Lau Kwan Ho, “The 1994 Practice Statement and Twenty Years On” [2014] SingJLS 408. 111 In the UK, see, for instance, Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 (distinguishing and not following Duncan v Cammell, Laird and Co Ltd [1942] AC 624); R v Gould [1968] 2 QB 65 (overruling R v Wheat [1921] 2......
-
State proceedings in the Commonwealth Caribbean
...of the doctrine in the Caribbean, see A. Burgess "Judicial Precedent in the West Indies" (1978) 1 Anglo Am. L. Rev. 113. 118 [1968]1 All E.R. 874. An alternative citation is [1968] A.C. 910. 119 See Bradley & Ewing, supra n. 1, at pp. 754-758 for an analysis of the decision and the subseque......
-
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS
...the law there may be times when a departure from precedent is in the interest of justice and the proper development of the law". (See (1968) 1 All E.R. 874 at 892 D E). With particular reference to the recent cases of Jammal (supra) and Owumi (supra), based as they are in part on some of th......