Cook v Sprigg
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1899 |
Year | 1899 |
Date | 1899 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
71 cases
-
Maclaine Watson & Company Ltd v International Tin Council
...into by independent sovereign states between themselves on the plane of international law. That was firmly established by this House in Cook v. Sprigg [1899] A.C. 572 578, and was succinctly and convincingly expressed in the opinion of the Privy Council delivered by Lord Kingsdown in Secre......
-
Winfat Enterprise (HK) Company Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong
...Board that no municipal court has authority to enforce such an obligation. This was laid down by Lord Halsbury L.C. in Cook v. SpriggELR [1899] A.C. 572, 578–579, and by Lord Dunedin in Vajesingji Joravarsingji v. Secretary of State for India in Council (1924) L.R. 51 Ind.App. 357, 360–361.......
-
Hoani Te Heuheu Tukino v Aotea District Maori Land Board
...legislature of its power to alter or amend such a statute by later enactments.” (At p. 327.) 1 (1924) L.R. 51 I.A. 357. 2 Ibid., 360. 3 [1899] A.C. 572. 4 (1915) L.R. 42 I.A. 229, ...
-
Natural Resources Conservation Authority v Seafood and Ting International Ltd; Natural Resources Conservation Authority v DYC Fishing Ltd [Consolidated Suits]
...sovereign states between themselves in the plane of international law. That was firmly established by this House in Cook v Sprigg [1899] A.C. 572, 578, and was succinctly and convincingly expressed in the opinion of the Privy Council delivered by Lord Kingsdown in Secretary of State in Coun......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
...Radio Ltd [1968] 2 QB 740, 753 (Diplock LJ); Wacando v Commonwealth (1981) 148 CLR 1, 11 (Gibbs CJ), 21 2 (Mason J); Cook v Sprigg [1899] AC 572, 579 (Earl of Halsbury LC for Earl of Halsbury LC, Lords Watson, Hobhouse, Macnaghten and (120) Tasmanian Wilderness Society Inc v Fraser (1982) 1......
-
Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
...within its own territory, this was based on applying89. Oetjen v Central Leather Co (1918) 246 US 297 (‘Oetjen’).90. Cook v Sprigg [1899] AC 572, 578 (‘Cook’).91. Duke of Brunswick v King of Hanover (1848) 9 ER 993.92. Eng-Lye Ong, ‘Non-justiciability in Private International Law: Principle......
-
Reconceptualising ‘Justiciability’: Crafting a Coherent Framework for Australia’s Unique Constitutional Context
...within its own territory, this was based on applying89. Oetjen v Central Leather Co (1918) 246 US 297 (‘Oetjen’).90. Cook v Sprigg [1899] AC 572, 578 (‘Cook’).91. Duke of Brunswick v King of Hanover (1848) 9 ER 993.92. Eng-Lye Ong, ‘Non-justiciability in Private International Law: Principle......