Copley v Delanoy
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 01 January 1706 |
Date | 01 January 1706 |
Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 125 E.R. 917
Common Pleas Division
REPORTS and CASES of PRACTICE in the COURT of COMMON PLEAS, in the Reigns of QUEEN ANNE, KING GEORGE I. and KING GEORGE II. By a late Eminent Hand. The Third Edition, with the ADDITIONAL CASES and REFERENCES contained in MS. Notes made by L. C. J. EYRE and Mr. JUSTICE NAMES. Edited by THOMAS TOWNSEND BUCKNILL, of the Inner Temple, Barrister at Law. 1872. [1] COPLEY versus DELANOY. EASTER 5 ANNE, 1706. Notice to be given of executing a sci' fac' inquiry. Strangeways v. Ascough, Mich. 4 Geo. I. post, p. 14. In this cause, the plaintiff having proceeded to execute a writ of scire facias inquiry, without giving notice of the time of executing the same, a motion was made to set aside the execution thereof ; and several practicers having been consulted concerning the practice in this particular, it appeared that notice was usually given, and yet that it had been ruled good without. But the Court thinking it reasonable, that the party should in all cases have an opportunity of seeing that he bad justice done him, in respect to the measure of damages, or other matter to be inquired of, declared that for the future notice should always be given ; and the defendant, on paying costs, had leave to plead to the writ. [2] RAWLINS versus PARRY, UN' ATTORN', &C. MICH. 6 ANN. 1707. Privilege. Attorney. But vide Higginson v. Urnfreville, post, p. 47. Midd. es. Upon a motion against the sheriff, for not allowing a writ of privilege for the discharge of the defendant, who was taken into custody on a King's Bench progress; a precedent *as cited of a writ of privilege...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
A.N. and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality
...v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPT 2011 AER (EC) 729 2011 ECR I-3375 2011 3 CMLR 10 LOFINMAKIN & AMONUSI v MIN FOR JUSTICE & ORS UNREP COOKE 1.2.2011 2011/31/8618 2011 IEHC 38 HARRISON (JAMAICA) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPT; B (A) (MOROCCO) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DE......
-
Re McGuckian (No 1)
...Ltd. v. I.R.C.ELR[1982] A.C. 300 and Furniss (Inspector of Taxes) v. DawsonELR [1984] A.C. 474applied. Per Lord Lloyd, Lord Steyn and Lord Cooke. (1) During the last 30 years there had been a shift away from literalist to purposive methods of construction. Where there was no obvious meaning......
-
Birks v Trippet
...of parcel, although they have notice of more, and the award shall be good for such parcel.(1) But he said, that admitting * Omelade v. Cooke. (1) See also the same diversities in 1 Roll. Abr. 256, pi. 7, 8, 9. Cro. Jac. 200, Middteton v. Weeks. Cro. Eliz. 839, Risden v. Inglet. But these ni......
-
William Hyde, since Deceased, v Mary Price, John Price, William Price, William Mann Godshall, Thomas Shearcroft, Edward Walwyn Shepherd, and William John Playters, all since Deceased, and The Governor and Company of the Bank of England; and George Hart v Chase Cradock, William Temple, George Maule, and William Brown and Mary, his wife
...v. Hapson, 4 Brown, P. C. 550; Jacomb v. Harwootl, 2 Vesey, sen. 265 ; Omichund v. Barker, Bidgeway hmpore Hardwicke, 285 ; G-rosvenor v. Cooke, 1 Dickens, 305 ; Parker v. Hutehinson, 3 Vesey, 133 ; Upton v. Lord Ferrers, 5 Vesey, 801 ; and Lowndes v. Collens, 17 Vesey, 27. (1) Thia case of......
-
Mortal dangers, moral hazard and mortgage lending by solicitors: an international perspective
...J in The Russell-Cooke Trust Company v Elliott andothers (2001) HC0001425, 23rd March, LAWTEL 16/5/01,which will be referred to as Russell-Cooke (1).(9) SDT 8321/2001, para. 91.(10) Ibid., p. 28. The format of SDT ®ndings is somewhateccentric. All paragraphs are numbered until a ®nal sectio......
-
Hearsay after Crawford: a practitioner's guide.
...to determine when an emergency has ended, is the key to determining the admissibility of testimonial statements. THE HONORABLE MARCIA G. COOKE (1) (1.) A special thank you to Rocio Blanco Garcia, a third-year law student at Florida International University College of Law. Ms. Garcia's assis......
-
Introduction: Fiftieth Anniversary of the Uniform Code of Military Justice Symposium Edition
...2000 INTRODUCTION: FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE SYMPOSIUM EDITION BRIGADIER GENERAL (RETIRED) JOHN S. COOKE1 This introductory article to the symposium issue of the Military Law Review, which celebrates the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Uniform Code of Military......
-
Facts, Fiction, and the Fourth Estate
...Four-Day Six-DayVariable Dummy Dummy DummyC 0.0006 0.0004 0.0006(1.60) (1.55) (1.60)S&P 0.484 0.486 0.4872(15.02)*** (15.20)*** (15.26)***COOKE1 0.0052(2.61)***COOKE2 0.0037(3.71)***COOKE3 0.0015(1.06)R20.448 0.448 0.45D-W statistic 1.76 1.77 1.77F-statistic 100.65*** 100.69*** 99.21***Obse......
-
Sheffield and South Yorkshire Navigation Act 1903
...lris heirs and assigns (in this section rcferred to as " the ~~.t~~il&, owner ") the following provisions sliall unless otherwise agreed Cooke. 1)etween the Company and the owner have effect (that is to say) :- (1) Notwithstanding anything in this Act or slioivn on the deposited plans the C......
-
Chapter 552, HB 2390 – Bond Issues
...over Sycamore Creek at LM 11.49 Cheatham SR-12 SR-12 over Dry Fork Creek at LM 16.41 Cheatham SR-49 SR-49 over Harpeth River at LM 0.39 Cooke 1-40 1-40 Eastbound lane over Pigeon River at LM Cooke 1-40 1-40 Eastbound lane over Pigeon River at LM 9.76 Cooke 1-40 1-40 over Branch at LM 2.4 Co......