Corps v Owners of the Paddle Steamer Queen of the South; The Queen of the South

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1968
Date1968

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • Planmarine AG v Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 10 March 1999
    ...founded practice. In coming to its decision, the court relied on the decisions of Brandon J (as he then was) in The Queen of the South [1968] P 449; [1968] 1 All ER 1163 and Sheen J in The Freightline One [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 266. We were asked by Miss Ang to overrule the practice endorsed ......
  • The Freightline One
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • Invalid date
  • Eschersheim, The (Dortmund, Erkowit, Jade, Salus (formerly Rotesand))
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 July 1975
    ...by a Divisional Court not to be an agreement for the use or hire of it. Both of these decisions appear to me to be plainly right. In The Queen of the South (1968) Probate Division, page 449, Mr. Justice Brandon himself held that contracts for mooring services by watermen using motor boats f......
  • Monte Ulia (Owners) v Banco and Others (Owners); Banco, The
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 December 1970
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Conclusion : reconceptualising the maritime lien and the conflict of laws
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • 1 January 2011
    ...lien closely follows the equitable lien.56 Like a maritime lien, an equitable lien is a 48 See, for example, The Queen of the South [1968] P 449; Hill v The Ship “James Cook” [1997] 3 NZLR 752.49 See DWM Waters, “The Equitable Lien” (1988) 18 University of Western Australia Law Review 22; F......
  • CLAIMS FALLING WITHIN SECTION 3(1)(H) OF THE HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT AND THE RIGHT OF ARREST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...conferred by section 4(4)(a) of the HCAJA does not arise. 99 The relational requirement stipulated in section 4(4) of the HCAJA. 100 [1968] P 449. 101 [1972] 2 QB 543. 102 [1976] 1 All ER 441. 103 Ibid, at 459f. 104 [1976] 1 All ER 441 at 459g to h. 105 See The I Congreso del Partido[1978] ......
  • Bibliography - a Selection
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Review of Administrative Sciences No. 35-1, March 1969
    • 1 March 1969
    ...und Beamten- recht. Z.B.R., 12/1968, pp. 381-385. CASSIN, Ren6, Droits de l’homme et mithode com- parative. R. Int. Dr. Comp., 3/1968, pp. 449-492. WITTKAMPER, Gerhard W., Uber bei Regierungs- und Verwaltungssystemen. Ver., CATALDI, Giuseppe, Sintesi dello stato attuale della 1/1969, pp. 1-......