Corps v Owners of the Paddle Steamer Queen of the South; The Queen of the South

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1968
Year1968
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • Planmarine AG v Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • March 10, 1999
    ...founded practice. In coming to its decision, the court relied on the decisions of Brandon J (as he then was) in The Queen of the South [1968] P 449; [1968] 1 All ER 1163 and Sheen J in The Freightline One [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 266. We were asked by Miss Ang to overrule the practice endorsed ......
  • The Freightline One
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • Invalid date
  • Monte Ulia (Owners) v Banco and Others (Owners); Banco, The
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 9, 1970
  • Gatoil International Inc. v Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • December 13, 1984
    ...in section 1(1) of the Act of 1956, as regards English cases, a more liberal approach was preferred. The relationship accepted in The Queen of the South [1968] P. 449, was quite loose: the agreement for mooring etc. of a ship was held to fall within section 1(1)( h), (in which paragraphs ( ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Conclusion : reconceptualising the maritime lien and the conflict of laws
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • January 1, 2011
    ...lien closely follows the equitable lien.56 Like a maritime lien, an equitable lien is a 48 See, for example, The Queen of the South [1968] P 449; Hill v The Ship “James Cook” [1997] 3 NZLR 752.49 See DWM Waters, “The Equitable Lien” (1988) 18 University of Western Australia Law Review 22; F......
  • CLAIMS FALLING WITHIN SECTION 3(1)(H) OF THE HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT AND THE RIGHT OF ARREST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • December 1, 1997
    ...conferred by section 4(4)(a) of the HCAJA does not arise. 99 The relational requirement stipulated in section 4(4) of the HCAJA. 100 [1968] P 449. 101 [1972] 2 QB 543. 102 [1976] 1 All ER 441. 103 Ibid, at 459f. 104 [1976] 1 All ER 441 at 459g to h. 105 See The I Congreso del Partido[1978] ......
  • Bibliography - a Selection
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Review of Administrative Sciences No. 35-1, March 1969
    • March 1, 1969
    ...und Beamten- recht. Z.B.R., 12/1968, pp. 381-385. CASSIN, Ren6, Droits de l’homme et mithode com- parative. R. Int. Dr. Comp., 3/1968, pp. 449-492. WITTKAMPER, Gerhard W., Uber bei Regierungs- und Verwaltungssystemen. Ver., CATALDI, Giuseppe, Sintesi dello stato attuale della 1/1969, pp. 1-......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT