Corps v Owners of the Paddle Steamer Queen of the South; The Queen of the South

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1968
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 cases
  • Planmarine AG v Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 10 Marzo 1999
    ...founded practice. In coming to its decision, the court relied on the decisions of Brandon J (as he then was) in The Queen of the South [1968] P 449; [1968] 1 All ER 1163 and Sheen J in The Freightline One [1986] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 266. We were asked by Miss Ang to overrule the practice endorsed ......
  • The Freightline One
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • Invalid date
  • Monte Ulia (Owners) v Banco and Others (Owners); Banco, The
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 Diciembre 1970
  • Eschersheim, The (Dortmund, Erkowit, Jade, Salus (formerly Rotesand))
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 Julio 1975
    ...by a Divisional Court not to be an agreement for the use or hire of it. Both of these decisions appear to me to be plainly right. In The Queen of the South (1968) Probate Division, page 449, Mr. Justice Brandon himself held that contracts for mooring services by watermen using motor boats f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Conclusion : reconceptualising the maritime lien and the conflict of laws
    • South Africa
    • Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • 1 Enero 2011
    ...lien closely follows the equitable lien.56 Like a maritime lien, an equitable lien is a 48 See, for example, The Queen of the South [1968] P 449; Hill v The Ship “James Cook” [1997] 3 NZLR 752.49 See DWM Waters, “The Equitable Lien” (1988) 18 University of Western Australia Law Review 22; F......
  • CLAIMS FALLING WITHIN SECTION 3(1)(H) OF THE HIGH COURT (ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION) ACT AND THE RIGHT OF ARREST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 Diciembre 1997
    ...conferred by section 4(4)(a) of the HCAJA does not arise. 99 The relational requirement stipulated in section 4(4) of the HCAJA. 100 [1968] P 449. 101 [1972] 2 QB 543. 102 [1976] 1 All ER 441. 103 Ibid, at 459f. 104 [1976] 1 All ER 441 at 459g to h. 105 See The I Congreso del Partido[1978] ......
  • Bibliography - a Selection
    • United Kingdom
    • International Review of Administrative Sciences No. 35-1, March 1969
    • 1 Marzo 1969
    ...und Beamten- recht. Z.B.R., 12/1968, pp. 381-385. CASSIN, Ren6, Droits de l’homme et mithode com- parative. R. Int. Dr. Comp., 3/1968, pp. 449-492. WITTKAMPER, Gerhard W., Uber bei Regierungs- und Verwaltungssystemen. Ver., CATALDI, Giuseppe, Sintesi dello stato attuale della 1/1969, pp. 1-......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT