Cory Brothers and Company, Ltd, v The Turkish Steamship "Mecca."
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 08 April 1897 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1897] UKHL J0408-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 08 April 1897 |
[1897] UKHL J0408-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Monday the 2nd as Tuesday the 3rd days of March 1896, upon the Petition and Appeal of Cory Brothers and Co., Limited, of Cardiff, in the county of Glamorgan, Colliery Proprietors, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 4th (signed 5th) of July 1895, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of the Turkish Steamship "Mecca," lodged in answer to the said Appeal; and due consideration had this day of what was offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 4th (signed 5th) of July 1895, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby, Reversed, and that Judgment be entered for the Appellants (Plaintiffs below), for 401 l. 2 s. 9 d.: And it is further Ordered, That the Respondents do pay or cause to be paid to the Appellants the Costs incurred by them in the Courts below, and also the Costs incurred by them in respect of the said Appeal to this House; the amount of such last-mentioned Costs to be certified by...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi and Brothers Company (“AHAB”) v Saad Investments Company Ltd (in Official Liquidation) (“SICL”) and Others
...conclusive and may be displaced quite easily: Cory Brothers and Company Limited v The Owners of the Turkish Steamship “Mecca” (The Mecca) [1897] AC 286, 295 {R1/3/10} per Lord Macnaughten (House of Lords). 2075 As Annex M1/1 {A2/46/1} correctly notes, without also noting (as it should) that......
-
Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd and another
...payment, in order to ascertain how in fact he did appropriate it” See also Cory Bros & Co Ltd v Owners of the Turkish Steamship “Mecca” [1897] AC 286 (“ Cory Bros”), Lord MacNaghten at p 294. Primeo led no evidence that it had appropriated the remittances to its pre-August 2002 investments ......
-
Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd v Halabi (in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of the late Madam Intisar Nouri)
...13 ChD 696, 728, in a passage cited with approval by Lord Macnaghten in Cory Bros & Co Ltd v Turkish Steamship Mecca (owners), The Mecca [1897] AC 286, 295–296, where he said that it was: “a very convenient rule, and I have nothing to say against it unless there is evidence either of an agr......
- Goring, The (Admiralty)
-
The Maritime Claimant’s Right to Security: “The Suhaili 5201”1
...the writer’s. 33. [1971] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 37 at 44 and 45. 34. See inter aliaCory Brothers and Co, Ltd. v. The Owners of the S.S. “Mecca”[1897] A.C. 286 and Seymour v. Pickett[1905] 1 K.B. 715. 35. Per Lord Macnaghten in Cory Brothers and Co. Ltd. v. The Owners of the S.S. “Mecca”[1897] A.C. ......