Cottle v Cottle
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1939 |
| Year | 1939 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
-
Auten v Rayner
...For this pro-position Mr. Pritt referred to the case in the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division of ( Cottle v. Cottle 1939 2 All England Reports, page 535). In that case a husband who was an applicant before magistrates in a matrimonial dispute objected to the propriety of the Chairman ......
-
Trevor Jenkins(Appellant) v Robert Whittington
...Whittington Respondent REPRESENTATION: Counsel: Appellant: Self-represented Respondent: S Geary Asciak v Samuels (1976) 15 SASR 265 , Cottle v Cottle [1939] 2 All ER 535, Lindon v Commonwealth (No 2) (1996) 70 ALJR 541, Murlan Consulting Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC......
-
Augustin Lionel Applicant v The Honourable Attorney-General Respondent [ECSC]
...Justices 1924 1 K.B. 256; 3. Frome United Breweries v Keepers of the Peace and Justices for County Borough of Bath 1926 A.C. 586; 4. Cottle v Cottle 1939 2 A.E.R. 535; 5. Sadovnik v Keilman Ltd (1960) 3 W.I.R. 119; and 6. Holmes v Nelson 1979 Tasmanian Reports 89. 27 Counsel submitted that ......
- R v Camborne Justices. ex parte Pearce
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Contemporary issues of bias in adjudication
...2000 constituted, in this 92 R. v. Hundley (1921) 61 D.L.R. 656. 93 Wade and Forsyth, Administrative Law 7 th edn. (1994), p. 487. 94 [1939] 2 All E.R. 535. 95 Ibid. writer's respectful view, a serious error by any standard. This is all the more so when it is considered that the error has b......