Cox Toner (WE) (International) Ltd v Crook

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Date1981
Year1981

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
206 cases
  • Henry v London General Transport Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 March 2002
    ... ... conditions and rota set out in the new contract presented to us, which we consider to be unworkable, but bearing in mind that the same was ... of affirmation of a contract of employment was considered in WE Cox Toner International Ltd v Crook [1981] ICR 323 , Browne-Wilkinson J, President, ... ...
  • Bournemouth University Higher Education Corporation v Buckland
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Sheridan vs Peninsula Business Services,B Stern-Gillet
    • United Kingdom
    • Industrial Tribunal (NI)
    • 31 October 2018
    ...even where there is a breach, the employee may choose to give an employer an opportunity to remedy it (see further W E Cox Toner (International) Ltd v Crook [1981] IRLR 443, which was recently referred to with approval in the case of Colomar Mari v Reuters Ltd [2015] UKEAT/0539/13 and more ......
  • Harpreet Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 May 2018
    ...analysis) through the more substantial decisions in Woods v W.M. Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd [1981] ICR 666 and W. E. Cox Toner (International) Ltd v Crook [1981] ICR 823 (both judgments of Browne-Wilkinson J) to the decisions of this Court in Lewis v Motorworld Garages Ltd [1986] ICR 1......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Employee Competition: Recent Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 7 July 2010
    ...IRLR 867 ("essentially the legal embodiment of the everyday concept of letting bygones be bygones" per McCombe J) and Cox Toner v Crook [1981] IRLR 443. Rimer LJ stated (para "an innocent party, faced with a repudiation of the contract by the other contracting party, has an option to affirm......
1 books & journal articles
  • WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 December 1999
    ...6 ¶ 17—18. 156 See, generally, 16 Halsbury’s Laws (4th ed, 1992) at paras 302—03, 305—10. 157 WE Cox Toner (International) Ltd v Crook [1981] IRLR 443, cited in Bliss v South East Thames Regional Health Authority, supra n 146; Rigby v Ferodo Ltd[1987] IRLR 516 (HL). See also Samia El-Ibiary......