Coyle v Watson (John) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1915 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Dow v Amec Group Ltd
...Bourhill v Young 1942 SC (HL) 78; 1943 SLT 105; [1943] AC 92; [1942] 2 All ER 396 Brown v JohnWatson Ltd 1914 SC (HL) 44; 1914 1 SLT 406; [1915] AC 1 Cairns v Northern Lighthouse Board [2013] CSOH 22; 2013 SLT 645 Campbell v North Lanarkshire Council 2000 SCLR 373 Donaldson v Hays Distribut......
-
Mittun v Salvesen & Company
...v. London County CouncilELR, [1908] 2 K. B. 807; Eke v. Hart-DykeELR, [1910] 2 K. B. 677. 9 1913 S. C. 549. 10 1914 S. C. (H. L.) 44, [1915] A. C. 1. 11 1919 S. C. (H. L.) 62, [1919] A. C. 12 1927 S. C. 21. 13 1930 S. C. (H. L.) 90, [1930] A. C. 599. 14 [1908] 2 K. B. 807. 15 [1910] 2 K. B.......
-
Bourhill v Young
...v. John Watson, Ltd., 1914 S. C. (H. L.) 44, Lord Shaw of Dunfermline at pp. 50 and 51, sub nom.Coyle or Brown v. John Watson, LtdELR. [1915] A. C. 1, at pp. 12 and 13 4 Dulieu v. White & SonsELR, [1901] 2 K. B. 669;Wilkinson v. DowntonELR, [1897] 2 Q. B. 57; Pugh v. London, Brighton and So......
-
Hambrook v Stokes Brothers
... ... Those cases were followed in Dulieu v. White & Sons F5 ; and in Coyle v. Watson F6 Lord Shaw treated Victorian Railways Commissioners v. Coultas F7 as no longer ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
What is wrong with modern unjustified enrichment law in South Africa?
...the name of ‘public policy’ and, worse, to do85 Idem 553.86 Ibid. 87 Idem 554.88 Ibid; Watermeyer JA referred to Farmer’s Mart Ltd v Milne 1915 AC 106.89 Ibid.90 Idem 555.91 Ibid.92 Ibid.93 The relaxation was not allowed in Mamoojee v Akoo supra n 14; Henry vBanfield supra n 14; Jorddan v P......