Crane v Hegeman-Harris Company Inc.

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1939
Year1939
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
108 cases
  • Ashville Investments Ltd v Elmer Contractors Ltd; Elmer Contractors Ltd v Ashville Investments Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 May 1987
    ...within the arbitration clause." 26 The learned Judge's approach in the Printing Machinery case was approved by this Court in Crane v. Hegeman-Harris Co. Inc. (1939) 4 A.E.R. 68. Nevertheless, for the reasons I have already given, I do not think that either decision constitutes a precedent b......
  • Rose (F. E.) (London) v William H. Pim Jnr. & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 July 1953
    ...which the parties entered, and the terms of the contract into which they had entered must be clearly proved. 21 In the case of Crane v. Hegeman-Harris Company, Inc., which is reported in 1939 Volume 1 of the All England Law Reports at page 662, Mr Justice Simonds (as he then was) at page 66......
  • Joscelyne v Nissen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 December 1969
    ...He then referred to other dicta that we have mentioned indicating that he was unable to accept them as correct. 19 Next we have Crane v. Hegeman-Harris Co. Inc. (1939) 1 A.E. 662 decided by Mr. Justice Simonds. The facts need not be set out. The judge at page 664 said this: "Before I consid......
  • Scragg (Ernest) & Sons Ltd Perseverance Banking and Trust Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 April 1973
    ...to agents in Israel. 8 I must say that I can see no possible case for rectification Here, even on the evidence that is given. In Crane v. Hogoman-Harris Co. Inc. 1939 1 A.E.R. 662 at page 664, Mr. Justice Simonds said: "The Court can only act for rectification if it is satisfied beyond all ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Mistake
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 August 2020
    ...(Nf‌ld CA) at para 23; Williamson v Williamson (2004), 240 DLR (4th) 456 (Sask CA) at para 27. And see Crane v Hegeman-Harris Co Inc , [1939] 1 All ER 662 (Ch). 252 Joscelyne v Nissen , above note 251 at 1222–23. 253 MF Whalen (The) v Pointe Anne Quarries Ltd (1921), 63 SCR 109 at 127, 63 D......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT