Crane v Hegeman-Harris Company Inc.

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1939
Date1939
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
115 cases
  • Ashville Investments Ltd v Elmer Contractors Ltd; Elmer Contractors Ltd v Ashville Investments Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 Mayo 1987
    ...within the arbitration clause." 26 The learned Judge's approach in the Printing Machinery case was approved by this Court in Crane v. Hegeman-Harris Co. Inc. (1939) 4 A.E.R. 68. Nevertheless, for the reasons I have already given, I do not think that either decision constitutes a precedent b......
  • Rose (F. E.) (London) v William H. Pim Jnr. & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 Julio 1953
    ...which the parties entered, and the terms of the contract into which they had entered must be clearly proved. 21 In the case of Crane v. Hegeman-Harris Company, Inc., which is reported in 1939 Volume 1 of the All England Law Reports at page 662, Mr Justice Simonds (as he then was) at page 66......
  • Joscelyne v Nissen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 Diciembre 1969
    ...He then referred to other dicta that we have mentioned indicating that he was unable to accept them as correct. 19 Next we have Crane v. Hegeman-Harris Co. Inc. (1939) 1 A.E. 662 decided by Mr. Justice Simonds. The facts need not be set out. The judge at page 664 said this: "Before I consid......
  • Cold Storage Holdings Plc and Others v Overseas Assurance Corporation Ltd and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 29 Marzo 1988
    ...1 Lloyd's Rep 487 (distd) Braund v Mutual Life & Citizens Assurance Co Ltd [1926] NZLR 529 (folld) Crane v Hegeman-Harris Co Inc [1939] 1 All ER 662, Ch D (refd) Crane v Hegeman-Harris Co Inc [1939] 4 All ER 68, CA (refd) Eureka Insurance Co v Robinson Reas & Co (1867) 56 Pn 256 (refd) Hawk......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Mistake
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...(Nf‌ld CA) at para 23; Williamson v Williamson (2004), 240 DLR (4th) 456 (Sask CA) at para 27. And see Crane v Hegeman-Harris Co Inc , [1939] 1 All ER 662 (Ch). 252 Joscelyne v Nissen , above note 251 at 1222–23. 253 MF Whalen (The) v Pointe Anne Quarries Ltd (1921), 63 SCR 109 at 127, 63 D......