Cranfield v Bridgegrove Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 14 May 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Civ 656 |
| Date | 14 May 2003 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
Akram v Adam
...he had ever made with the postman. 19 Although this court had decided the five appeals under the title Cranfield v Bridgegrove Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 656, [2003] 1 WLR 2441 on 14 th May 2003, and the case was reported on 31 st October 2003, the district judge does not appear to have appreciate......
-
Olafsson v Gissurarson
...rule 7.6(3)". 9 A differently constituted Court of Appeal returned to this question in another group of cases reported as Cranfield and another v Bridgegrove Ltd [2003] 1 WLR 2441. In one of those cases, all of which concerned attempts to effect service of proceedings after the expiry of th......
-
Hills Contractors and Construction Ltd v Malcolm Struth and Another
...been granted. The need for compliance with the rules practice directions and orders now forms an essential part of the CPRCranfield v Bridgegrove [2003] 1 WLR 2441 which was referred to in the Hanjin Shipping case. 29 In Murphy the defendant's solicitors had confirmed that they had instruct......
-
Mucelli v Albania
...a claim form by one of the methods allowed by rule 6.2, for an order dispensing with service of the claim …." 80 In Cranfield v Bridgegrove Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 656 the court emphasised that "[t]he Godwin principle is important, and must not be subverted. It will be subverted unless the powe......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Normal Service - Hills v Struth
...upon the notes at 6.2.3 and 6.3.13 of the White Book, together with obiter dicta of the Court of Appeal in Murphy v Staples UK Limited [2003] 1 WLR 2441, in which the claimant sent the sealed claim form by first class post to the defendant's registered office and, in addition, sent a photoc......
