Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
130 cases
-
Cardwell vs The Youth Justice Agency
...move everyday items, with claims about how he was affected in his domestic life. 3.9 In the case of Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Limited [2002] IRLR 24, which was a case where the adverse effects of the claimant’s impairment – occupational asthma – on his normal day-to-day activities were ex......
-
Dr D Legg v The University of Manchester: 2401880/2022
...Work performed by an employee may include some normal day-to-day activities (Law Hospital NHS Trust v Rush [2001] IRLR 611; Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast [2002] IRLR 24). 283. In looking at the impact of the impairment the focus should be on what an individual cannot do or can only do with di......
-
Mary Erwin vs Respondents Rutledge Training Ltd
...relevant to the assessment of whether the claimant is a disabled person. (Law Hospital NHS Trust v Rush [2001] IRLR 611; Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd [2002] IRLR 24 duties while at work will often encompass normal day-to-day activities. At the very least, evidence of ability or inability......
-
Mr I Escudier v Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Great Britain Ltd: 2304209/2022
...(A partnership) the EAT held that these four questions should be dealt with sequentially and not together. 6. In Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Limited 2002 ICR 729 the EAT held that the time to assess the disability is the date of the alleged discriminatory act. In Richmond adult community co......
Get Started for Free
