D'Arcy v The Tamar, Kit Hill, and Callington Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1865
Year1865
CourtExchequer
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Uxbridge Permanent Benefit Building Society v Pickard
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Evans' Charity Trustees F13 ; D'Arcy v. Tamar, etc., Ry. Co. F14 ; and Buckley on Companies, ... In the case of a limited company the actual authority of an agent is of necessity ... ...
  • McMillan v Guest (Inspector of Taxes)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 April 1942
    ... ... of assessment was a director of a limited company, A. Wander, Ltd., had held a public office of ... 274 adopted by Lord Atkinson in G.W. Railway v. Bater, 1922, 2 A.C. at p. 28 as a generally ... ...
  • The East Holyford Mining Company v The National Bank
    • Ireland
    • Common Pleas Division (Ireland)
    • 1 May 1871
    ...Grant v. NorwayENR 10 C. B. 665. Burns v. PennellENR 2 H. L. C. 497. Holt's CaseENR 22 Beav. 48. D'Arcy v. Tamar Railway CompanyELR L. R. 2 Ex. 158. Ridley v. Plymouth Grinding CompanyENR 2 Ex. 711, 717. Ernest v. NichollsENR 6 H. L. C. 401. Howbeach Company v. TeagueENR 5 H. & N. 151. Wool......
  • Gillies v Craigton Garage Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House - First Division)
    • 15 February 1935
    ...[1924] 1 K. B. 775, Bankes, L.J., at pp 785, 786, 787: D'Arcy v. The Tamar, Kit Hill, and Callington Railway Co.ELR, (1867) L. R., 2 Ex. 158. 7 2 App. Cas. 366, Sir Barnes Peacock at pp. 372, 379. 8 6 El. & Bl. 327, 5 El. & Bl. 248. 9 Heiton v. Waverley Hydropathic Co.UNK, (1877) 4 R. 830, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT