D. S. Blaiber & Company, Ltd v Leopold Newborne (London)Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1953 |
| Date | 1953 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
Limerick City Council v Uniform Construction Ltd
...DESIGNS & TRADE MARKS & PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE (IRL) LTD 2004 3 IR 410 2004 2 ILRM 401 DS BLAIBER v LEOPOLD NEWBORNE (LONDON) LTD 1953 2 LLOYD'S REP 427 HALSBURY LAWS OF ENGLAND 4ED 1973 VOL 2 PARA 623 ABSALOM (FR) LTD v GREAT WESTERN (LONDON) GARDEN VILLAGE SOCIETY 1933 AC 592 NILS HEI......
-
Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal
...(see Landauer v. Asser [1905] 2 K.B. 184 at p. 191 as explained in Champsey Bhara v. Jivraz [1923] A.C. at p. 487 and Blaiber v. Newborne [1953] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 427). 48Applying these principles, I think the decision of the Superintending Examiner should be treated as part of the record. It ......
-
Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal
...(see Landauer v. Asser [1905] 2 K.B. 184 at p. 191 as explained in Champsey Bhara v. Jivraz [1923] A.C. at p. 487 and Blaiber v. Newborne [1953] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 427). 48Applying these principles, I think the decision of the Superintending Examiner should be treated as part of the record. It ......
-
The National Housing Trust v YP Seaton & Associates Company Ltd (Jamaica)
...with the same intensity, where the error lies in the answer to a question specifically referred to the arbitrator: see DS Blaiber & Co Ltd v Leopold Newborne (London) Ltd [1953] 2 Lloyd's Rep 427and Giacomo Costa Fu Andrea v British Italian Trading Co Ltd [1963] 1 QB 201. That again is cl......
Get Started for Free
