Dabas v High Court of Justice in Madrid, Spain
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Judgment Date | 04 May 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWHC 971 (Admin) |
| Date | 04 May 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
42 cases
-
R (Farid Hilali) v Secretary of the Home Department
...arrest warrant is based on a high level of confidence between Member States” (the tenth recital). As Lord Bingham said in Dabas v High Court of Justice in Madrid, Spain [2007] UKHL 6, [2007] 2 AC 31 at [4]: “The important underlying assumption of the Framework Decision is that member states......
-
Andrew Symeou v Public Prosecutor’s Office At The Court of Appeals, Patras, Greece
...A new and simplified system of surrender of suspects for prosecution was to be created. As Lord Hope put it in Dabas v High Court of Justice in Madrid, Spain [2007] UKHL 6, [2007] 2 AC 31, at para 42: “The principle on which this new system is based is the mutual recognition of criminal dec......
-
Osunta v Public Prosecutor's Office, Düsseldorf
...would be framed in English law. 9 He set out his brief reasoning. He adopted the reasoning of Lord Hope at paragraph 51 of Dabas v High Court of Justice, Madrid [2007] 2WLR 254. He concluded that although in Dabas the House of Lords approved excision so as to limit a period of time, it was ......
-
Thompson v France
...... [2008] EWHC 2787 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ... of the Framework Decision, as to which see Dabas , per Lord Bingham of Cornhill at paragraph 4.” ... No 5 of the National Court of Justice Madrid Spain [2006] EWHC 167 (Admin) , at paragraph ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
‘Surrendering’ the Fugitive—The European Arrest Warrant and the United Kingdom
...the surrender procedures between Member States, OJ L190, 18 July 2002,preamble, para. (10). 104 [2006] EWHC 167, [2007] 1 WLR 124.105 [2006] EWHC 971.106 2007 SLT 14. See also, the analogous but not identical arguments in La Torre v Advocate 2006 SLT 989. 107 Ibid. at 26. 379 The Journal of......