Dadourian Group International Inc. (a company incorporated under the Laws of the State of New York) and Others v Azuri Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
JudgeMr Justice Warren,MR JUSTICE EVANS-LOMBE,MR JUSTICE WARREN
Judgment Date14 November 2007
Neutral Citation[2006] EWHC 699 (Ch),[2007] EWHC 1673 (Ch),[2006] EWHC 3492 (Ch),[2007] EWHC 2634 (Ch),[2006] EWHC 2973 (Ch),[2007] EWHC 454 (Ch)
Docket NumberHC04C00366,Case No: HC 04C00366,Case No: HC04000366,Case No: HC040003666
Date14 November 2007

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
33 cases
  • PJSC National Bank Trust v Boris Mints
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 April 2022
    ...to date. Among the 150 authorities cited for the hearing, I was referred to only three decisions on the subject: i) Dadourian v Simms [2006] EWHC 2973 (Ch), in which Warren J observed at [742]–[744]: “Although the doctrine of privity is an aspect of issue estoppel, it does not necessarily f......
  • Dadourian Group International Inc. and Others v Simms and Others (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 2006
    ... ... Dadourian Group International Inc (A Company Incorporated Under The Laws of The State of New ... ...
  • Parbulk II as v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 30 November 2011
    ...Yukong v Rendsberg (supra) (CA); (v) Salomon v Salomon; (vi) Adams v Cape (CA); and (vii) (the trial judgment in Dadourian, reported at [2006] EWHC 2973. Accordingly, the quantum of the freezing order was limited to the extent to which there was credible evidence to meet that test. iii) As ......
  • Linsen Transport International Ltd v Humpuss Sea Transport PTE Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 14 September 2011
    ...exercises substantive control over the assets in question of the non-cause-of-action defendant (Dadourian Group, supra) [Dadourian Group International and others v Azuri Limited [2005] EWHC 1768 (Ch)]; (vi) The law in this area is evolving significantly and it is undesirable to deprive it o......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Hedge Fund Fraud: An English Law Perspective On The Potential Exposure Of Prime Brokers
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 8 August 2007
    ...Act 2006 dealing with shareholder derivative claims are due to be brought into force in October 2007. 24 [2005] EWCA Civ 1612. 25 [2006] EWHC 2973 (Ch). 26 Either because there are assets belonging to MIF in England over which an English insolvency practitioner should be appointed, or becau......
1 books & journal articles
  • PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL AS A LAST RESORT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...at [167]–[184]. 28 As set out in Ben Hashem v Al Shayif[2008] EWHC 2380 (Fam) at [159]–[164]. 29 [1933] Ch 935. 30 [1962] 1 WLR 832. 31 [2006] EWHC 2973. 32 As the Court of Appeal noted in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp[2012] EWCA Civ 808 at [79]; [2012] 2 Lloyd's Rep 313 at ......