Dakhyl v Labouchere (NOTE)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1908 |
| Date | 1908 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
- Smith's Newspapers Ltd v Becker
-
Steve Morgan CBE v Associated Newspapers Ltd
...of my decision, serve no purpose. Therefore, I formally dismiss the application. 1s.1(1) Defamation Act 2013 provides: 2 Dakhyl v Labonchere [1908] 2 KB 325, 327 per Lord Loreburn. See also Leech v Leader Publishing Co. Ltd. [1926] 2 DLR 28; (1926) 20 Sask LR 337, 350per Lamont JA: “Fair......
-
Joseph and Others v Spiller and Another
...he held at p 112 that if comment was to be "fair" it had to be relevant and not such as to disclose in itself actual malice. 39 In Dakhyl v Labouchere, (Note) reported at [1908] 2 KB 325, the House of Lords was concerned not with literary criticism but with a publication that described a d......
-
Sutherland v Stopes
...question of fair comment. "The plea of fair comment does not arise if the plea of justification is made good" (per Lord Loreburn in Dakhyl v. Labouchere, L.R. 1908, 2 K.B. 325n.). But although this may be the ordinary rule, I agree with the Court of Appeal in holding that there is difficul......
Request a trial to view additional results