Dakhyl v Labouchere (NOTE)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1908
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Smith's Newspapers Ltd v Becker
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Steve Morgan CBE v Associated Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 6 Julio 2018
    ...of my decision, serve no purpose. Therefore, I formally dismiss the application. 1s.1(1) Defamation Act 2013 provides: 2 Dakhyl v Labonchere [1908] 2 KB 325, 327 per Lord Loreburn. See also Leech v Leader Publishing Co. Ltd. [1926] 2 DLR 28; (1926) 20 Sask LR 337, 350per Lamont JA: “Fair......
  • Joseph and Others v Spiller and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...he held at p 112 that if comment was to be "fair" it had to be relevant and not such as to disclose in itself actual malice. 39 In Dakhyl v Labouchere, (Note) reported at [1908] 2 KB 325, the House of Lords was concerned not with literary criticism but with a publication that described a d......
  • Sutherland v Stopes
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 Noviembre 1924
    ...question of fair comment. "The plea of fair comment does not arise if the plea of justification is made good" (per Lord Loreburn in Dakhyl v. Labouchere, L.R. 1908, 2 K.B. 325n.). But although this may be the ordinary rule, I agree with the Court of Appeal in holding that there is difficul......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT