Dallal v Bank Mellat
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 26 July 1985 |
| Date | 26 July 1985 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
-
Victor Eugene Thompson and Terry Lynne Thompson v Clarence Victor Thompson
... ... GrayUNK [1987] 3 All ER 345 Yat Tung Investment Co Ltd v Dao Heng Bank LtdELR [1971] AC 581 Grant v Edwards and anotherUNK [1986] 2 ... and which Hobhouse J. referred to as ‘the leading modern authority’ in Dallal v. Bank Mellat (1886) 1 All E.R. 239, 248 ... It was a decision of the Privy Council and therefore ... ...
- Ka Wah Bank Ltd v Low Chung Song
-
R v Lyons ; R v Parnes ; R v Ronson ; R v Saunders (No 3)
...distinction between the procedures being mandatory or discretionary. In consequence, we derive no assistance from Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] 1 QB 441. That case shows that, when considering recognition, competence can be derived from international law and comity requires a domestic court t......
-
R v Lama
...AC 179, per Lord Reid at pp. 206, 211, per Lord Morris at pp. 215–17, per Lord Pearce at pp. 225, 226; Dallal v. Bank Mellat[1986] QB 441 per Hobhouse J.) In recent years English courts have shown a much greater willingness to examine and interpret treaties which have not been implemented i......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Malaysian High Court Considers The Legality Of An Underlying Contract Which Was The Subject Of Arbitration
...have raised in the arbitration in an application to set aside an award? This practice is frowned upon in England (Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] QB 441) and Singapore (Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S I Likvidation v Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd [2011] 4 SLR This area is relatively und......
3 books & journal articles
-
Forbidding depecage: law governing investment treaty arbitration.
...to the former. See infra note 49 and accompanying text (discussing instances of "systemic" depecage). (37.) Dallal v. Bank Mellat, [1986] Q.B. 441. (38.) Id. at (39.) The Algiers Accords consist of two "declarations" made by the Government of Algeria on behalf of the Islamic Republic of Ira......
-
THE APPLICATION OF THE HENDERSON V HENDERSON RULE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
...22 Filip De Ly & Audley Sheppard, “ILA Final Report on Res Judicata and Arbitration” (2009) 25(1) Arbitration International 67 at 80. 23[1986] 1 QB 441. 24Dallal v Bank Mellat[1986] 1 QB 441 at 455. 25 Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] 1 QB 441 at 455. 26 Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] 1 QB 441 at 4......
-
DEVELOPMENTS IN ARBITRATION LAWS
...law need not be the law of the seat of arbitration, as long as it is the municipal law of another country. In Dallal v Bank Mellat[1986] 1 All ER 239, at p. 252, Hobhouse J held that: “Whilst English law, like most foreign legal systems, may seek to exercise some measure of control over arb......