Daubney v Cooper

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of the King's Bench
Year1829
Date1829

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • R v Denbigh Justices, ex parte Williams
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • William Clarke v Bank of Nova Scotia Jamaica Ltd
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 26 April 2013
    ...the open justice principle, at page 257, said: ‘An essential characteristic of courts is that they sit in public (see Daubney v Cooper (1829) 10 B & C 237 at 240, Dickason v Dickason (1913) 17 CLR 50, Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 and Russell v Russell (1976) 134 CLR 495 at 520 per Gibbs J). ......
  • Hogan v Hinch
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 March 2011
    ...38 FCR 248 at 259 per Lockhart J, Gummow J agreeing at 263, French J agreeing at 268. 26 (1992) 38 FCR 248 at 259 per Lockhart J. 27 Daubney v Cooper (1829) 10 B & C 237 at 240 [ 109 ER 438 at 440]; Dickason v Dickason (1913) 17 CLR 50; [1913] HCA 77; Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417; Russe......
  • David Harold Eastman v DPP
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 22 August 2014
    ...Supreme Court of New South Wales, 26 June 1995: BC 9504840 applied Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161 applied Daubney v Cooper (1829) 10 B & C 237 referred to David Syme & Co Ltd v General Motors-Holden's Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 294 applied Davies v The King (1937) 57 CLR 170 applied Dicka......
  • Get Started for Free