Daubney v Daubney

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1976
Year1976
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • David Austin Wilson v Heather Lovette
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 14 August 1997
    ...so acquired I think would be a relevant consideration. I have to have regard to the actual resources of each party. Daubney v Daubney[1976] 2 All E.R. 453. The word ‘resources’ in section 29 of the Act is entirely unqualified and so the Court should approach the matter realistically taking ......
  • Kathleen Yolanda Vivian Smith v Rupert Earlston Smith 1993 Divorce Jur. No. 281
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 31 July 1995
    ...application. In approaching the present case I have to have regard to the actual resources of each party Daubney v Daubney[1976] 2 All E.R. 453. The first stage is to make as reliable an estimate as possible of the parties' financial position and future prospects. In making this assessment ......
  • Craig Laurie Barnard Petitioner/Respondent v Penelope Ann Barnard Nee Bird Respondent/Applicant [ECSC]
    • St Lucia
    • High Court (Saint Lucia)
    • 5 May 2006
    ...with reference to Section 25 (1) (a) of the Act. He relied on decisions in several English cases in applying these provisions: ( Daubrey v Daubrey [1976] 2 ALL E.R. 453; P V P [1978] 3 ALL E. R. 70; Wagstaff v Wagstaff [1992] 1 ALL E.R. 275; andHappe v Happe [1991] 4 ALL E.R., 527) 67 In th......
  • White v White
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 October 2000
  • Get Started for Free