David Agmashenebeli, The (Cargo owners) v The David Agamashenebeli (Owners)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Colman J |
| Judgment Date | 31 May 2002 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty) |
| Date | 31 May 2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
Pace Shipping Company Ltd v Churchgate Nigeria Ltd
...I have heard full argument upon it before deciding whether leave to appeal upon that question should be granted. 45 In The David Agmashenebeli [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 92 Colman J. said that the key question in applying section 2(2)(a) was whether the transfer of the bills of lading was “calle......
- Noble Chartering Inc. v Priminds Shipping Hong Kong Company Ltd (THE TAI PRIZE)
-
Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Ltd
...the goods ceased to attach to possession of the bill under section 2(2(a) of the Act. Having considered the decisions in The David Agmashenebeli [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 92, The Ythan [2006] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 457 and The Pace [2010] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 183, he held that the proper approach was to iden......
-
The “Yue You 902”
...Engineering Pte Ltd v United Malayan Banking Corp Bhd [1990] 1 SLR(R) 465; [1990] SLR 514 (distd) David Agmashenebeli, The [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep 92 (not folld) Delfini, The [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep 252 (folld) East West Corp v DKBS 1912 [2002] 2 Lloyd's Rep 182, HC (Eng) (folld) East West Corp v......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
RIGHTS UNDER BILLS OF LADING: TRAWLING THROUGH SINGAPORE WATERS
...arising from the particular terms of shipment for goods under a bill of lading such as those considered in The David Agmashenebeli[2003] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 92 will not be examined. 10 [1978—1979] SLR 416 at 419. 11 See J Sewell v James Burdick(1884) 10 App Cas 74 at 105; see also Playing Cards (......
-
INTRODUCTION
...Rep 211 (“the Motis Exports case”). But as Mr Chong’s article suggests, this may have been already assumed by Singapore courts. 31 [2003] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 92 (involving a Singapore company). 32 Ibid, at 105. 33 [1995] 2 AC 378. 34 Norfolk Southern Railway Co v James Kirby Pty Ltd 543 US 14 (20......