David Fenton Wingate v The Solicitors Regulation Authority

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLord Justice Singh,Lady Justice Sharp,Lord Justice Rupert Jackson
Judgment Date07 March 2018
Neutral Citation[2018] EWCA Civ 366
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Docket NumberCase No: C1/2017/1002 & 1003 & C1/2017/1249
Date07 March 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
  • Soophia Khan v Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 March 2022
    ...available for inspection by the SRA”. 20 On the meaning of “integrity” I was referred to dicta of Rupert Jackson LJ in Wingate v SRA [2018] EWCA Civ 366, [2018] 1 WLR 3969 at [95]–[103]: “95. Let me now turn to integrity. As a matter of common parlance and as a matter of law, integrity is......
  • The Law Society of Ireland v Coleman
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 7 September 2020
    ...of Mostyn J. in Malins v. Solicitors Regulatory Authority [2017] EWHC 835 (Admin), but this has been reversed by the Court of Appeal [2018] EWCA Civ 366; [2018] 1 W.L.R. 104 A related objection is made to the effect that the Disciplinary Tribunal did not identify any test for dishonesty; ......
  • Bilta (UK) Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Others v Natwest Markets Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 10 March 2020
    ...all members of society. It involves being truthful about important matters and respecting the property rights of others: Wingate v SRA [2018] EWCA Civ 366 at [93]. Acting dishonestly means simply not acting as an honest person would in the circumstances: Tan at 227 In what is now the leadi......
  • Mr Syed Muzaher Naqvi v Solicitors Regulation Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 2 June 2020
    ...48 In relation to the relevant legal principles, the SDT set out at [23] the test for integrity set out by Jackson LJ in Wingate v SRA [2018] EWCA Civ 366 at [100]. At [25] it set out the test for what constitutes dishonesty set out by Lord Hughes JSC in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT