Davies v Davies

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date15 October 1901
Date15 October 1901
Docket NumberNo. 2.
CourtCourt of Session
Court of Session
2d Division

Lord Low, Lord Justice-Clerk, Lord Trayner, Lord Moncreiff.

No. 2.
Davies
and
Davies.

Process—Reclaiming Note—Signature of counsel.—

In an action of separation and aliment, the husband, who had appeared by counsel up to the closing of the record, thereafter personally conducted his own case.

The Lord Ordinary having granted decree of separation and aliment, the defender lodged a reclaiming note signed by himself alone.

The pursuer having objected to the competency of the reclaiming note, on the ground that it was not signed by counsel, the defender alleged that he could not afford to obtain the services of counsel. Objection repelled in the circumstances of the case.

This was an action of separation and aliment at the instance of Mrs Rebecca Ash or Davies against her husband, who defended the action, and appeared by counsel up to the closing of the record.

After a proof, at which the defender conducted his own case, the Lord Ordinary granted decree of separation and aliment.

The defender presented a reclaiming note, signed by himself but not by counsel.

At the calling of the case in Single Bills, counsel for the respondent objected to the competency of the reclaiming note, on the ground that it was not signed by counsel, and argued;—The defender had made no attempt to obtain the signature of counsel, and the Court would not accept the signature of a party to a reclaiming note when the party had not at least made that attempt.2

The defender stated that he could not afford to obtain the services of counsel, and contended that when the necessary fees were paid, a party was entitled to have a reclaiming note heard though it was signed only by himself.

The opinion...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Fairford First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), (1998) 156 F.T.R. 1 (TD)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 27, 1998
    ...no capacity or authority to conclude such negotiations or agreements"? Para: 174 4.F.1. Plaintiffs' Position Para: 174 4.F.2. Facts Para: 175 4.F.3. The Crown's Duty Para: 183 4.F.4. Withholding of information by Canada Para: 187 4.G. Did Canada breach its fiduciary duty to the Fairford Ban......
  • CIB 4751 2002
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • January 21, 2004
    ...(Incapacity for Work) (General) Regulations 1995): (i) as regards sitting, 3(b) (15 points) or 3(c) (7 points); (ii) as regards standing, 4(f) (3 points); and (iii) (as regards rising from sitting), 5(c) (3 points). It follows that we need only consider whether there was an error of law in ......
  • R (Wiles) v Social Security Commissioners and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 16, 2010
    ...6c: 3 points). We also confirm the EMO's finding that she cannot stand for more than 30 minutes before needing to move around (Descriptor 4f: 3 points). However, for the reasons we have given above, we find that, in terms of the available descriptors, she has no walking problem and no probl......
  • Première nation de Fairford c. Canada (Procureur général) (1re inst.),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 1998
    ...s’attendait à ce que cette dernière négocie pour son compte. [1999] 2 C.F. 4.F.3. Thé Crown’s PREMIERE NATION DE FAIRFORD Dug C. CANADA 107 4.F.3. L’obligation de la [183] Thé relationship between the Crown and Indian bands respecting their lands and rights is governed by the twin policies ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
131 firm's commentaries
  • Service Of Process On Evasive Defendants
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 19, 2018
    ...in cases of foreign fictitious and anonymous website operators in trademark infringement cases has been authorized by U.S. courts under Rule 4(f)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.2 But Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) is only available in the case of individuals located in a foreign countr......
  • Treatment of Bitcoin Under U.S. Property Law
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • March 30, 2017
    ...See Xereas v. Heiss, 933 F. Supp. 2d 1, 7 (D.D.C. 2013) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 242 (1965)). 37 See 26 C.F.R. § 1.482-4(f)(3) (setting forth rules for identifying owner of intangible property for tax purposes where laws of an applicable jurisdiction are silent on the matter)......
  • Tender Offer Considerations for Cash Repurchases and Exchange Offers
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • July 1, 2009
    ...accepted for payment, after the expiration of 40 business days from the commencement of the tender offer. c. Pro Rata Acceptance Rule 13e-4(f)(3) requires that the tender offer by the issuer or affiliate is for fewer than all of the outstanding equity securities of a class, and the number o......
  • Form And Content Of Appellate Briefs
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 10, 2012
    ...§500.13(b); §670.10.3(g)(1); §800.10(c); §1000.11(b). 22 NYCRR §600.11(f)(1). 22 NYCRR §600.10(d)(1)(i); §670.10.3(a)(3); §800.8(a); §1000.4(f)(3). 22 NYCRR §600.10(d)(1)(v); 38 N.Y.2d 1, 4-5, 377 N.Y.S.2d 448, 450-451 (1975) (284-page main brief and 35-page reply brief). Ibid. 38 N.Y.2d at......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
57 books & journal articles
  • Revisiting Granite Falls: Why the Seattle Monorail Project Requires Re-examination of Washington's Prohibition
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 29-01, September 2005
    • Invalid date
    ...as two out of three governing body members were elected, whereas here there are only two out of seven members elected. 187. Petition 1, § 4(f)(3). 188. Seattle Monorail Project, Board of Directors, at http://www.elevated.org/project/board (last visited July 189. Petition 1, § (4)(g)(l). 190......
  • SUBSTITUTED SERVICE AND THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 63 No. 5, April 2022
    • April 1, 2022
    ...to means of service prescribed by foreign law, directed by a foreign authority, or at least not prohibited by foreign law. (44) And Rule 4(f)(3) allows courts to order other means of service, but only if they are "not prohibited by international agreement." (45) Several states have adopted ......
  • Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas Employment Law. Volume 1 Part VIII. Selected litigation issues
    • May 5, 2018
    ...Damages . See Damages Local Ordinances Marital status, §24:6.A National origin, local ordinances prohibiting discrimination based on, §24:4.F.3 Privacy issues regarding sexual orientation, §28:9.G Race discrimination, §22:5.B Religious discrimination, local ordinances prohibiting, §24:5.H.3......
  • Parochial procedure.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 69 No. 4, April 2017
    • April 1, 2017
    ...motions to quash foreign service, dismiss for inadequate service abroad, or request court approval for alternative service abroad under Rule 4(f)(3), judges do one of three things: (1) they find the Convention satisfied on its own terms (because the Central Authority has returned a certific......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 forms
  • U.S. Withholding Tax Return for Dispositions by Foreign Persons of U.S. Real Property Interests
    • United States
    • United States Forms Treasury Department
    • January 1, 2023
    ...transferor’s agent or a transferee’s agent solely because it performs one or more of the activities described in Regulations section 1.1445-4(f)(3) (relating to activities of settlement officers and clerical U.S. person. A person described in section 7701(a)(30). Exceptions to Section 1446(......
  • Foreign Tax Credit - Corporations
    • United States
    • United States Forms Treasury Department
    • January 1, 2022
    ...year the new reference ID number is used. Branches. For each branch that is not a foreign branch, as defined under Regulations section 1.904-4(f)(3)(vii), use a single line to report such branch's gross income and deductions. In column 1, enter “Branch.” If there is more than one branch, en......
166 provisions
  • New Jersey Register, Volume 45, Issue 08, April 15, 2013
    • United States
    • New Jersey Register
    • Invalid date
  • Repatriation of Prisoners Act 1984
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 1984
    ...and Justice Functions) Order 2010 (S.I. 2010/976), art. 1(2), Sch. 8 para. 9 (with arts. 28-31)Modifications etc. (not altering text) C21 S. 4F(3)(c): transfer of functions (12.4.2010) by The Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Devolution of Policing and Justice Functions) Order 2010 (S.I. 2010/976)......
  • The Port Talbot Steelworks Generating Station Order 2015
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 2015
    ...works" is defined in section 52(1). (43) The document is available at this link: http://www.nationalgrid.com/NR/rdonlyres/4DD2D3FF-B973-4F3C-A8C3-CDB640526660/45082/Developmentnearoverheadlines.pdf. (44) The document is available at this link: (45) The guidance note is available at this lin......
  • The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Order 2010
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • January 1, 2010
    ...is amended as follows— (a) in paragraph 4E(1)(a) after “article 77” insert “or 77A”; (b) in the definition of “bond” in paragraph 4F(3) after “article 77 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001” insert “, and includes any instrument falling within ar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT