Davison and Dymmocks Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1792
Date01 January 1792
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 597

COURT OF WARDS, AND OTHER COURTS AT WESTMINSTER

Davison and Dymmocks Case

let, 17. davison and dymmocks case 597 michael. 7 jacobi. davison and dymmocks case. Thomas, late Earl of Sussex, being seised in his demesne as of fee, in an acre and a half of land, lying at Weston, in the county of Lincoln, did hold the same of the late Queen Elizabeth, as of her fee of Crown-land, of which fee the late Queen was seised in fee simple by admittance, the said earl being so thereof seised, did procure license from the late Queen, and suffered a common recovery thereof, (inter alia) whereby he made his wife a joynture, anno 24 Eliz. After which, the said late earl and his countesse died, seised of the said lands in Weston, (inter alia) and the same descended to the now earl, as cosin and heir to the said late earl, who sold unto William Davison, late father of John Davison the said acre and half in Weston, in fee simple, which, said William Davison after dieth thereof seised in fee simple (inter alia) and the same descended unto John Davison, as son and heir unto William, as was found by office, by vertue of a quee plura, taken after the death of William Davison, and it was thereby further found, that the said acre and half, was holden at the time of the decease of the said William Davison, of the said late Queen, and at the time of the taking of the said inquisition of the Kings Majesty that now is by knights service in capite. Question. First, whether the said acre and half acre in Weston be holden by knights service in capite, or onely by knights service ? Secondly, admitting the said tenure shall onely be adjudged a tenure by knights service, and not in capite, then, whether the said John Davison, son and heir to William Davison, can by any law be admitted [17] to traverse the tenure by knighta service in capite, found after the death of his father, or may have any other remedy by law, and resolved by Coke and Tanfield, that the suing of the license of alienation, is no conclusion unto the party, whereby the same lands should become to be holden of the King in capite, because the words of the license are, (quae de nobis tenentur in capite, ut dicitur) but yet that the same may be used as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Webber v Stanley
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 21 April 1864
    ...I declare that the said Frederick Drummond and Thomas Best, their executors, administrators, and assigns, shall be 1304 W EBBER V. STAN LEY 16 C. B. (N. 8.) 704. possessed thereof upon trust that they the said trustees, or the survivor of them, or the executors or administrators of such sur......
  • Page v Page Re Page
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1853
    ...next friend, held irregular, and discharged. On the llth of January 1853 an ex parte order was made upon the authority of WellesUy v. Welle&ley (16 Sim. 1), giving leave to Sarah Elizabeth Page, a married woman living separate from her husband, to file a bill and sue in formd pauperis witho......
  • Furber v Sturmey
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 25 May 1858
    ...to set aside the order should have been made either in the Vacation or at least in the early part of Hilary Term : Smith v Temper-ley (16 M. & W. 273) The fact that the notice of appeal is not in compliance with rule 141 of the rules and orders framed in pursuance of the 19 & 20 Viet c 108,......
  • Tucker v Johnson
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 4 November 1848
    ...except an eldest or only son, his, her and their heirs and assigns for ever, as tenants in common and not as V.-C. V.-29* 906 SCAKF V. SOU LEY 16 SIM. 343. joint-tenants; and if there should be but one child who should live to attain the age of twenty-one years except an eldest or only sou,......
25 books & journal articles
  • Legislación aplicable
    • European Union
    • Principales obligaciones medioambientales para la pequeña y mediana empresa
    • 11 January 2013
    ...9.1.2. - Legislación del Estado Español Prevención y Control Integrados de la Contaminación (IPPC). Autorización Ambiental Integrada. · Ley 16/2002, de 01/07/2002, de prevención y control integrado de la Contaminación. (BOE nº 157, de Page 148 Actividades Clasificadas: Molestas, Insalubres,......
  • La justicia gratuita en los litigios trasfronterizos europeos
    • European Union
    • La cooperación judicial civil en la Unión Europea
    • 1 March 2006
    ...por la presente Directiva. En el caso de España este plazo no se cumplió, si bien sí que ha sido desarrollada la Directiva por medio de la Ley 16/2005, de 18 de julio (BOE 19 jul. 43.9. Entrada en vigor Se ha producido el día de su publicación en el Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europea......
  • La jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa en España
    • European Union
    • Modelos europeos de justicia contencioso-administrativa
    • 4 June 2007
    ...conocía el Consejo Real. Aquí se ha querido ver una importación del modelo francés de justicia administrativa retenida que inauguró la ley 16-24 de agosto de 1790 que en definitiva, aunque a través del concurso del Consejo de Estado, era de competencia de la Jefatura del Estado. Paralelamen......
  • Anexo 5.- Contaminantes orgánicos persistentes (COP). Situación actual
    • European Union
    • Principales obligaciones medioambientales para la pequeña y mediana empresa
    • 11 January 2013
    ...85/337/CEE, y de las otras disposiciones comunitarias en la materia. La directiva IPPC ha sido transpuesta a la legislación española en la Ley 16/2002, de 1 de julio, de prevención y control integrados de la · Medidas para reducir o eliminar las liberaciones derivadas de la producción no in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT