Deane et Al v Coward
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1726 |
| Date | 01 January 1726 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 125 E.R. 938
Common Pleas Division
Ante, p. 25, S. C.
Before allowance of writ of error or reversing outlawry by plea or otherwise, bail to be put in not only to answer plaintiff in Borne suit in a new action to be commenced by him for the cause mentioned in the first action, but also to satisfy the condemnation if the plaintiff shall begin his suit before the end of two terms next after allowance of error, or avoiding outlawry. Reg. Cur. 12 G. 1. A peer sued to outlawry as a common person may have a writ out of Chancery reciting that. he is a peer and that no other process shall be awarded against him than such as shall be against a peer. Lord Savill's case, Cro. Car. 205. [29] ANONYMUS. MICH. 12 GEO. I. 1725. Recognizances on outlawries. Vide Stat. 4 & 5 W. & M. c. 18. It was said by the Court, that upon or before the allowance of any writ of error, or reversing any outlawry, the defendant must still enter into a recognizance, with condition to satisfy the condemnation money, according to the stet. 31 Eliz, cap. 3, sect. 3. DOCKARY v. LAWRENCE. EAST. 12 G. I. 1725. Plea not amended in abatement. Salk. 52, 49. 5 Mod. 69. Smith v. Sundanwre, 2 Keb. 70, where amendment was said to have been denied. BORRET. A motion to amend a plea in abatement, by putting in culpabilis instead of capitalis, which appears to be only a misprision of the clerk, and two counsel heard on each side. For the plaintiff many cases were cited against amendments. The defendant's counsel cited none. Eyre Chief Justice Pleas in abatement have generally been denied to be amended, because they are dilatory and do not go to the right of the action, and it will be dangerous to make a precedent, wherefore the amendment was denied. HINGHAM V. COLLIN. EASTER, 12 GEO. I. 1726. In what time a non-prose may be signed for want of a declaration, Reg. Cur' Hil. 9 Ann. Reg. 3, Vid, Harvey v. Weston, post, p. 53 ; Pare v. Ellison, p. 83 ; Jones v. Hergest, p. 110. BORRET. On a motion to set aside a non-pros for want of a declaration, because the defendant's attorney had not called for a declaration the same term on which the writ was returnable, but bad called for a declaration, and signed a non-pros the term after : the Court were of opinion it was a good calling, and held the non-pros to be regular ; afterwards by consent it was set aside on payment of costs. [30] DEANE & AL' v. COWARD, (BIGG, JUN...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bonnar vs Bond Search and Selection Ltd,Bernard Rooney,Jonathan St. Clare
...in cross-examination as to why he did not reveal the fact, extent or frequency of his golfing activities to either his own GP or to Mr CCooke. 30. He was also challenged about his assertion that he regularly used a golf buggy at Ballycastle Golf Club, including during the winter months. Evi......
-
O (F) v Min for Justice & Refugee Applications Commissioner
...2009 IEHC 64 A (TT) v MIN FOR JUSTICE & REFUGEE APPLICATIONS CMSR UNREP COOKE 29.4.2009 2009 IEHC 215 A (RL) v MIN FOR JUSTICE UNREP COOKE 30.4.2009 2009 IEHC 216 N (N) v MIN FOR JUSTICE & REFUGEE APPLICATIONS CMSR UNREP COOKE 20.5 2009 2009 IEHC 234 S (P) (A MINOR) v REFUGEE APPLICATIONS C......
-
L (Q) & Y (Y) v Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform
...IMMIGRATION ACT 1999 S3(11) POINT EXHIBITION CO LTD v REVENUE CMRS 1993 2 IR 551 1993 ILRM 621 1993/9/2596 NEARING v MIN FOR JUSTICE UNREP COOKE 30.10.2009 2009/42/10430 2009 IEHC 489 REFUGEE ACT 1996 S5 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS & FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8 RSC O.84 r18(2) IMMIGR......
-
M (N) v Min for Justice
...ART 33 EEC DIR 2005/85 ART 15 EEC DIR 2005/85 CHAP II EEC DIR 2005/85 ART 15(3)(A) N (SU) [SOUTH AFRICA] v REFUGEE APPLICATIONS CMSR UNREP COOKE 30.3.2012 2012/33/9649 2012 IEHC 338 REFUGEE ACT 1996 S17(7G) EEC DIR 2005/85 ART 34(3)(A) EEC DIR 2005/85 ART 32(3) REFUGEE ACT 1996 S13(6) D (HI......
-
§ 13.01 Jurisdiction and Choice of Law
...638 So.2d 912 (Ala. App. 1994). California: Muckle v. Superior Court, 102 Cal. App.4th 218, 125 Cal. Rptr.2d 303 (2002). Georgia: Cooke v. Cooke, 30 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1262 (Ga. 2004). Indiana: Harris v. Harris, 922 N.E.2d 626 (Ind. App. 2010); Jenkins v. Futch, 640 N.E.2d 379 (Ind. App. 19......