Demolition and Construction Company Ltd v Kent River Board
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1963 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Y P Seaton & Associates Company Ltd v National Housing Trust
...computation of the interest due to the appellant on the sum he had awarded for contractor's profit and risk. 39 In Demolition & Construction Co Ltd v Kent River Board (1963) 2 Lloyd's Rep 7 the court held that unless the arbitrator sets out in his award the whole of the evidence relied u......
-
Carpaolo Nominees Pty Ltd and Epicure Pty Ltd v Marrosan Nominees Pty Ltd [NTR]
...of costs where there is a “sealed offer”, noting the general rule and the overriding discretion. He also referred to Demolition & Construction Co Ltd v Kent River Board [1963] 2 Lloyd's Rep 7 at 15 where McNair J reflects on the measure of success required when deciding on the award of cos......
-
Willowood Lakes Ltd v Board of Trustees of the Kingston Port Workers Superannuation Fund
...court will intervene is demonstrated in the following passage from the judgment of McNair J. in Demolition & Construction Company Ltd. v Kent River Board [1963] 2 Lloyd's Reports 7 at page 13. The passage was approved by our Court of Appeal in Marley and Plant Limited v Mutual Housing Servi......
-
Hong Huat Development Co (Pte) Ltd v Hiap Hong & Company Pte Ltd
...Shipping Co S.A. (1978) 1 Lloyd’s Law Reports 391 at 396 and 398 and Demolition & Construction Company Ltd v Kent River Board (1963) 2 Lloyd’s Law Reports 7 at p 12 Mr Teh cited The Law and Practice Relating to Appeals from Arbitration Award by D. Rhidian Thomas 1994 p 214 and the case of C......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...Pty Ltd (in liq) (No.3) [2019] NSWSC 560 at [36]–[38], per Stevenson J. 1244 Demolition and Construction Co Ltd v Kent River Board [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 7 at 16; Sir Lindsay Parkinson & Co Ltd v Triplan Ltd [1973] 1 QB 609 at 624, per Lord Denning MR. Compare Corby District Council v Holst [......