Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd (trading as Washington DC)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL,LORD HOFFMANN,LORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD,LORD MILLETT,LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE
Judgment Date23 November 2000
Judgment citation (vLex)[2000] UKHL J1123-1
Date23 November 2000
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
233 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • IP Bulletin - November 2012
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 11 December 2012
    ...inference, by establishing that its design was produced independently (following Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416). Concerning the origin of Spring Meadow, Judge Birss considered that the similarities between the fabrics coupled with the overall circum......
  • 'Does That TV Program Or Film Copy That Book?' The Limits Of ‘Colourable Imitation' In Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 November 2018
    ...2 Cinar Corporation v. Robinson, 2013 SCC 73 [Cinar], at para 27, citing Designers Guild Ltd. v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700, at p. 3 CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13at para 8 4 Andrews v. McHale, 2016 FC 624, at para 88. 5 Cinar at p......
  • Cinar Corporation V Robinson, 2013 SCC 73
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 January 2014
    ...a substantial part of the infringed work" and cited the House of Lords in Designers Guild Ltd. v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.) at 706, for the proposition that "... the "part" which is regarded as substantial can be a feature or combination of features of t......
10 books & journal articles
  • Are Fashion Designers Better Protected in Continental Europe than in the United Kingdom? A Comparative Analysis of the Recent Case Law in France, Italy and the United Kingdom
    • United States
    • Wiley The Journal of World Intellectual Property No. 13-3, May 2010
    • 1 May 2010
    ...v Rainaldi, AIDA, 2005, 590.68 The most recent and highest court’s judgment applying it is Designers Guild v RussellWilliams (Textiles) [2001] FSR 11 (HL).69 University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601; Ladbroke vWilliam Hill [1964] 1 WLR 273, at 291.r2009 Blackwe......
  • Scanning Cultural Heritage: The Implications for Intellectual Property and Cultural Institutions.
    • United Kingdom
    • Art Antiquity & Law Vol. 25 No. 1, April 2020
    • 1 April 2020
    ...Civ 1328, [2010] Ch 503 [66]. (194) Davies et al., above, note, 102, 57-58. (195) Designers Guild Ltd v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2001] FSR 11 (HL) (196) Ronan Deazley, 'Letter' (2001) 23(12) European Intellectual Property Review 601, 602. (197) Petri, above, note 3, 6. (198) Sawkin......
  • The Review Roles of the Court of Appeal: Grobelaar v News International
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 64-6, November 2001
    • 1 November 2001
    ...in the judgmentsin Grobelaar:to a relatively high degree of probability per Simon Brown LJ43,38 Para 232.39 The Times 15 May 2001.40 [2000] 1WLR 2416.41 [1995] 1 Ll LR 455 CA (a scuttling case).42 See also Jewo Ferrous BV vLewis Moore (a Firm) The Times 30 December 2000 CA; Commissionersof ......
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...another”s skill and labour: see Lord Scott of Foscote in the House of Lords case of Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textile) Ltd[2000] 1 WLR 2416 at 2431. The House of Lords also held that in ascertaining whether the benefit of skill and labour has indeed been appropriated, the natu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT