En dett port per Eliz. Taw Execut de J. Taw, Company v William Bury, le Case fuit
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 323
DEL COMMON-BANK
Robert Rede port action de dett, &c. en que le Case fuit, que Alyce Mody fuit
IX. Robert Rede port action de dett, &c. en que le Case fuit, que Alyce Mody fuit seisi en fee del Greyhound in Fleetstreet, & possess de certeyn biens en le meason & demyse & grant mesme le Mess & biens a Thomas Lawse & son femrae pur 21 Anns rendant antiualmeot 131. &e. apres que le dit Alice enter en le dit Mess & ent infeoif Rede, le lesse reenter, Rede mor le reversion discend a Robert Rede le Rent arere per Ann. Robert Rede port le Action & avoit jugement a recover le entier rent pur ceo c^ ceo issist Hors del Mess & nemy Hors del Chattels. H. 2. El. 716,
To continue reading
Request your trial
71 cases
-
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Cook
...General Rules because the terms of the will prohibited any such deduction; (3) the two sums of £50 constituted the sole income of Miss Cook; and (4) she was therefore not liable to pay income tax at all. 56 Those are the facts of this case, and on a consideration of them I am unable to see ......
-
Fitzgerald v Hall, Russell & Company Ltd
...more than twenty-six weeks shall count under paragraph ( a) of the foregoing sub-paragraph between any two periods falling under paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Schedule. (3) Paragraph ( b) of sub-paragraph (1) of this paragraph shall not apply to a temporary cessation of work on account of a st......
-
Melanie (Owners of S.S.) v San Onofre (Owners of S.S.)
...W. Robinson, p. 406), the " Edward Hawkins Lushington, page 15" (a decision of the P.C. in Lushington, page 15), the " Killeena" ( 6 P.D. 193 and 4 Asp., p. 472), and my own decision, if I may quote it, in the " Dart" ( 6 Aspinall, p. 81) and a recent decision of Hill, J. in the " Tarbert" ......
-
Stevenson's Executors v Inland Revenue
...until he attained majority (or in one case until he attained the age of 25) or married under the specified age. 5 Of these features numbers 1 and 4 are found in the present case, but numbers 2, 3 and 5 are not. It may be that numbers 2 and 3 are not essential and that the exception might be......
Request a trial to view additional results