Dhar v National Office of the Public Prosecution Service the Netherlands

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2012] EWHC 697 (Admin)
Year2012
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Naveed Din v Director of Public Prosecutions of The Augsburg Public Prosecutors Office, Germany National Crime Agency (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 March 2017
    ...is involved, the detail must also be sufficient to enable the transposition exercise to take place." 11 In Dhar v The Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697, Moore-Bick LJ held, at [117]: "Although I accept that the warrant need not contain highly detailed information of the kind that one might expect......
  • Pinnick v Court of First Instance No 2 of La Linea De La Conception, Spain
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 March 2013
    ...which Ms Barnes sought to distinguish. The first is Sanjay Dhar v National Office of the Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697. King J delivered the judgment of the Divisional Court, with which Moore-Bick LJ agreed. That case concerned the validity of an EAW on which......
  • Kemen Uranga Artola v The 6th Section of the National High Court of Madrid, Spain
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 6 March 2013
    ...21 In his written submissions Mr Summers also referred to Dhar v National Office of the Public Prosecution Service, the Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697 (Admin). In that case the EAW as originally issued contained no details in box (b). It was amended after it was first signed, but before steps ......
  • Owen Campbell v Public Prosecutor of the Grande Instance Tribunal of St-malo, France
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 May 2013
    ...to fall foul of what the Divisional Court decided in Dhar v National Office of the Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697 (Admin). In that case, an accusation warrant in which the defendant was accused of money laundering referred to funds received by the defendant wh......
  • Get Started for Free