Dhar v National Office of the Public Prosecution Service the Netherlands
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] EWHC 697 (Admin) |
| Year | 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
27 cases
-
Sean Alexander v The Public Prosecutor's Office, Marseille District Court of First Instance, France
...Prosecutor of Holland [2007] EWHC 3106 (Admin) at [7], and the judgments of King J and Moore-Bick LJ in Dhar v The Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697 (Admin) at [81] and [117], that, whilst a balance must be struck between the need for an adequate description to inform the requested person and the......
-
Gabriela Tilea v General Prosecutor's Office of the Court of Appeal in Ghent, Belgium
...that the person did the criminal act which led to conviction.” ( ibid. at [21]). 15 As Moore-Bick LJ observed in Dhar v. Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697 (Admin) at [68]: “Although … the warrant need not contain highly detailed information of the kind that one might expect to find in a civil ple......
-
Guenther Klar v Court of First Instance Brussels (Belgium)
...Lewicki v Italy [2018] EWHC 1160 (Admin) at [79]. 17 In Dhar v National Office of the Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697 (Admin), King J (with whom Moore-Bick LJ agreed) addressed the extent of the s.2(4)(c) requirement in these terms at [63] to [64]: “It is well ......
-
Naveed Din v Director of Public Prosecutions of The Augsburg Public Prosecutors Office, Germany National Crime Agency (Interested Party)
...is involved, the detail must also be sufficient to enable the transposition exercise to take place." 11 In Dhar v The Netherlands [2012] EWHC 697, Moore-Bick LJ held, at [117]: "Although I accept that the warrant need not contain highly detailed information of the kind that one might expect......
Get Started for Free
