Distillers Company (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1971
Year1971
Date1971
CourtPrivy Council

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
142 cases
  • Sevcon Ltd v Lucas CAV Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 17 April 1986
    ...and Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd. [1975] 1 W.L.R. 819 founded on the decision of the Privy Council in Distillers Co. (Biochemicals) Ltd. v. Thompson [1971] A.C. 458, on the question whether a cause of action arose within a particular jurisdiction under the provision of a N......
  • Morin v Bonhams & Brooks Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 December 2003
    ...or … what were the elements which constituted the gist of the relevant tort which it was alleged had been committed?": see Distillers Co. Ltd. v. Thompson [1971] AC 458, 469A-B; Metall und Rohstoff AG v. Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc. [1990] QB 391, 437B-G and 449B-D; and Dicey & ......
  • Base Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 22 October 2003
    ...to be acted upon in that forum and likely to cause damage there to those who in consequence place reliance on it. In Distillers Co. v. Thompson [1971] AC 458 an English company, Distillers, manufactured in England a sedative and sleep-inducing drug the principal ingredient of which was thal......
  • Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Company v Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 February 1983
    ...estimates and forecasts which were inadequate. Following what Lord Pearson said in Distillers Co. (Biochemicals) Ltd. v. Thompson [1971] A.C. 458 at page 468 I look back over the series of events alleged to constitute the tort and ask myself the question: "Where in substance did this cause......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • Jurisdictional Rule "x" in the Conflict of Laws: Challenges of Policy and Security in Internet Torts With Business Implications
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law No. 51-2, 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...matters. Distillers itself was decided long before the Internet was established. Distillers Co. (Biochemicals) Ltd. v. Thompson [1971] AC 458 (Eng.). Developing countries, searching for sustainable technology-compatible solutions, need to carefully consider such nuances.390. This will help ......
  • Choice of law in Australian torts or the truth about conflicts
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 13-1, June 2003
    • 1 June 2003
    ...an article which defamed a person. 33 The judges 30. (2000) 203 CLR 53 at 538. 31. See, for example, Distillers (Biochemicals) v Thomson [1971] AC 458; Buttigeig v Universal Terminal and Stevedoring Corporation [1972] VR 626; Macgregor v Application des Gaz [1976] Qd R175; Jacobs v Australi......
  • Edwards v Blomeley; Harriton v Stephens; Waller v James: wrongful life actions in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...(Clarke JA). (16) [2002] NSWSC 460 (Unreported, Studdert J, 12 June 2002) [63]. (17) See, eg, Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson [1971] AC 458. (18) [1982] QB 1166, 1178 (Stephenson (19) Harriton [2002] NSWSC 461 (Unreported, Studdert J, 12 June 2002) [15]. (20) See, eg, Bennett v ......
  • Failures for Consideration: Re‐Analysing Jurisdiction in Unjust Enrichment Claims
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 83-5, September 2020
    • 1 September 2020
    ...a large number ofcases with slender connections to England, complies with the court’s duty72 Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd vThompson [1971] AC 458, 467.73 Foskett vMcKeown [2001] 1 AC 102, 128 per Lord Millett and recently restated in First CityMonument Bank Plc vZumax Nigeria Ltd [2019]......
  • Get Started for Free