Doe on the demise of Vickery v Jackson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1819 |
| Date | 01 January 1819 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 171 E.R. 651
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS
8 CTABK. 284. DOE V. JACKSON 651 DOE ON THE DEMISE OF VlCKEBY V. JACKSON. (The breaking a doorway through the wall of a demised house into an adjoining bonse, and keeping it open for a long space of time, amounts to a breach of eOYenaat to repair ) This was an action of ejectment, brought against the assignee of the lessee of a house, on a forfeiture for breach of covenant. The lease contained a particular covenant, to repair within three months after notice, and also a general covenant to keep in repair The evidence of dilapidation principally relied upon, was that the defendant had broken a door-way through the wall of the demised house into the adjoining house. GttEney for the defendant contended, that the breach of covenant had been waived by the subsequent acceptance of rent after notice given, and said [294] that it had...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Spunner v Walsh
...& Mood. 39. Iggulden v. May 9 VEs. 325. Hayes v. BickerstaffENR Vaugh. 118. Smith v. Pocklington 1 Cr. & Jer. 445. Vickery v. JacksonENR 2 Stark. 293. Whatman v. GibsonENR 9 Sim. 196. Whitton v. Peacock 2 Scott, 630. WEbb v. RussellENR 3 T. R. 393. Patteson v. LongENR 6 Beav. 590. Doe d. Am......
-
Cowan v Factor
...repair and condition, on the determination of the lease. . . ." (1) 72 I. L. T. R. 196. (2) [1941] I. R. 499. (3) [1943] I. R. 380. (4) 2 Stark. 293. (1) I. R. 7 C. L. 207; I. R. 8 C. L. (2) [1909] 2 I. R. 510; [1911] 2 I. R. 631. (3) 1 C. P. D. 145. (4) 41 Ch. D. 103. (5) 5 Bing. (N. S.) 1......
-
Vernon v Small
...1 I. R. 76. (1) [1900] 1 Ch. 624, at pp. 635 and 636. (2) [1899] 1 I. R. 258, at p. 298. (3) [1925] 1 Ch. 847. (4) [1900] 2 Ch. 388. (5) 2 Stark, 293. (6) 10 I. J. (N. S.) 38. (7) [1925] 1 Ch. 847. (1) 2 My. & K. (2) 28 C. D. 103. (1) [1931] 1 Ch. 224, at p. 230. (1) [1925] 1 Ch. 847. (2) 7......
-
Doe dem. Margaret and Jane Dalton against Jones and Another
...now moved accordingly. The alterations made by the defendant were a breach of the covenant to repair, Doe dem. Vick&ry v. Jackson (2 Stark. N. P. 293). [Patteson J. In that case the door was made, not in an internal partition, but in a wall between two houses. Parke J. The covenant relied u......