Doe v Spiller
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1806 |
| Date | 01 January 1806 |
English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 833
IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS.
Doe
and
Spiller
END OF TRINITY TERM. i -/ A H f3 - [70] in michaelmas term, 47 geo. HI. [1806]. Second Sitting-day in Term. doe v. spiller. (If a notice to quit is directed to the tenant by a wrong Christian name, and he keeps it, it is a, waiver of the misdirection, and the lessor may recover on it, if there was no other tenant of the name ) Ejectment to recover the possession of the premises which the defendant held...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Field v Mitchell
...the sum for which the distress was made, out of which the expences were to be deducted ; that it was N. P. I.-27 834 DANIEL V. PITT BSP170 E.R. 833 IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS. Field and Mitchell field v. mitchell. (Case will not lie for taking an excessive distress, wher......
