Donald Campbell and Company, Ltd and Others v Pollak

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date01 February 1924
Judgment citation (vLex)[1924] UKHL J0201-1
Date01 February 1924

[1924] UKHL J0201-1

House of Lords

Donald Campbell and Company, Limited and Others
and
Pollak.
1

After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 24th and Friday the 25th, days of January last, and on Monday and Tuesday last, as yesterday and this day. upon the Petition and Appeal of Donald Campbell and Company, Limited, John Donington Campbell, George Charles Skeates, and George Islay campbell. all of No. 10, St. Mary Axe, in the City of London, praying. That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 2d of February 1923, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, and that the Petitioners might have the relief prayed for in the Appeal, or such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of Raymond Pollak, lodged in answer to the said Appeal (in which said Appeal...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
179 cases
  • Evans v Bartlam
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 April 1937
    ... ... The decision in Campbell v. Pollak , No. 2, (1927) A.C. 732 , was based upon the ... Donald Campbell v. Pollak (1927) A.C. 732 , is no authority for ... Great Western Railway Company 53 T.L.R. 399 ) that the discretion to grant or refuse a ... ...
  • Elders Pastoral Ltd v Bank of New Zealand
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 18 June 1990
    ... ... obtaining judgment in New Zealand courts against company - Company granted leave to appeal to Privy Council - Bank ... 1092H–103A, 1095E, G–1096C, D–E) ... Donald Campbell & Co. Ltd. v. Pollak [1927] A.C. 732 H.L.(E.) and ... ...
  • Wootton v Central Land Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 15 January 1957
    ... ... was made by the House of Lords in the case of ( Donald Compbell & Co. v. Pollak 1927 A.C. 732,809 ), where the ... to several cases, including that of Donald Campbell & Co.v. Pollak said this:"In the present case the ... ...
  • Chew Seok Tee; Lim Ker
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 3: The Award as to Liability for Costs
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Costs in Arbitration Proceedings
    • Invalid date
    ...& Sons [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 270. 55 E.g. The Maria [1993] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 168 per Sir Thomas Bingham M.R. at 173; Donald Campbell & Co. Ltd. v. Pollak [1927] A.C. 732 per Viscount Cave at 811–12. But see Bostock v. Ramsey U.D.C. [1900] 2 Q.B. 616, per A.L. Smith L.J. at 622: “The judge is n......
  • PUBLIC INTEREST COSTS ORDERS IN FEDERAL CLASS ACTIONS: TIME FOR A NEW APPROACH.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 2, April 2022
    • 1 April 2022
    ...1994) 7 [2.2] n 1. (48) Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534, 541 (Mason CJ) ('Latoudis'). (49) Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732, 811 (Viscount Cave LC) ('Donald (50) Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [No 2] (1996) 66 FCR 128, 131 (Einfeld J). (51) Latoudis (n 48) 540 (Ma......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Costs in Arbitration Proceedings
    • Invalid date
    ...Dineen v. Walpole [1969] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 261 3.3.5, 3.3.6 , 8.3 Dominion Brewery Ltd. v. Foster (1897) L.R. 507 6.10 Donald Campbell & Co. Ltd. v. Pollak [1927] A.C. 732 3.3.4 East v. Berkshire C.C. (1911) 106 L.T. 65 3.3.4 Eastwood, deceased, Re [1975] Ch. 112 5.5.2, 5.8.5, 5.10.3 Elgindata......