Donald Campbell and Company, Ltd and Others v Pollak
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 February 1924 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1924] UKHL J0201-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 01 February 1924 |
[1924] UKHL J0201-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel, as well on Thursday the 24th and Friday the 25th, days of January last, and on Monday and Tuesday last, as yesterday and this day. upon the Petition and Appeal of Donald Campbell and Company, Limited, John Donington Campbell, George Charles Skeates, and George Islay campbell. all of No. 10, St. Mary Axe, in the City of London, praying. That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 2d of February 1923, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, and that the Petitioners might have the relief prayed for in the Appeal, or such other relief in the premises as to His Majesty the King in His Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of Raymond Pollak, lodged in answer to the said Appeal (in which said...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Evans v Bartlam
... ... The decision in Campbell v. Pollak , No. 2, (1927) A.C. 732 , was based upon the ... Donald Campbell v. Pollak (1927) A.C. 732 , is no authority for ... Great Western Railway Company 53 T.L.R. 399 ) that the discretion to grant or refuse a ... ...
- Elders Pastoral Ltd v Bank of New Zealand
- Ruddock v Vadarlis and Others
-
Wootton v Central Land Board
... ... was made by the House of Lords in the case of ( Donald Compbell & Co. v. Pollak 1927 A.C. 732,809 ), where the ... to several cases, including that of Donald Campbell & Co.v. Pollak said this:"In the present case the ... ...
-
Cases referred to in 1965
...(1954) A.C. 378. ........................................................................ 248 Donald Campbell & Co. Ltd. v. Pollack (1927) A.C. 732, 810. ...................... 137 Draper v. Trist and others (1939) 3 All E.R. 513. ............................................... 137 Dyson v.......
-
PUBLIC INTEREST COSTS ORDERS IN FEDERAL CLASS ACTIONS: TIME FOR A NEW APPROACH.
...1994) 7 [2.2] n 1. (48) Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534, 541 (Mason CJ) ('Latoudis'). (49) Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732, 811 (Viscount Cave LC) ('Donald (50) Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [No 2] (1996) 66 FCR 128, 131 (Einfeld J). (51) Latoudis (n 48) 540 (Ma......
-
THE 'PRICE' OF JUSTICE? COSTS-CONDITIONAL SPECIAL LEAVE IN THE HIGH COURT.
...1998) (1) Transcript of Proceedings, Freidin v St Laurent [2007] HCATrans 251, 366-72. (2) See, eg, Donald Campbell & Co Ltd v Pollak [1927] AC 732, 811-12 (Viscount Cave LC); Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534, 569 (McHugh J). The principle that costs follow the event has a long histo......
-
LADEGA V. AKINLIYI
...the defendants could not later ask for relief against forfeiture. CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT. 1. Campbell & Co. v. Pollark (1927) A.C. 732, 811. 30 2. Worbi v. Asarnanvuah 14 W.A.C.A. 669. 3. Wurno v. United Africa Co. Ltd. (1956) 1 F.S.C. 33. 4. lnneh v. Obaraye 2 F.S.C. 58. Mr. G.E. Sh......