Donald v Suckling
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of the Queen's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Kathryn Bassano (Grantor/Claimant) v Alfred Toft (First Defendant) Peter Biddulph and Peter Biddulph Ltd (Second Defendants) Borro Loan Ltd and Borro Loan 2 Ltd (Third Defendants)
...and transfer, unlike a lien which is merely a right of possession: see Coggs v Bernard (1703) 2 Ld Raym 909per Holt CJ at 916, and Donald v Suckling (1866) LR 1 QB 585 per Blackburn J at 614. It is not necessary for the purpose of this case to determine the extent to which the interest is p......
-
Palgo Holdings Pty Ltd v Gowans
...mortgage as involving ‘in its essence, not the delivery of possession, but a conveyance of title as a security for the debt’. See also Donald v Suckling (1866) LR 1 QB 585 at 608 per Mellor J. In In re Morritt, Cotton LJ continued (at 232–233) by stating: ‘A mortgage of personal chattels ma......
-
CPIT Investments Ltd v Qilin World Capital Ltd and another
...arisen. Qilin also relies, in relation to these “reciprocal obligations”, on Johnson v Stear (1863) 15 CB(NS) 330 and Donald v Suckling (1866) LR 1 QB 585, which concerned pledges, in addition to O’Connor which concerned mortgages. It submits that these authorities show that a repudiatory b......
-
Public Prosecutor v Koh Beng Oon
...is no pledge for a contingent debt fell either way. Right to sub-pledge In the Court of Queen`s Bench`s decision in Donald v Suckling [1866] LR 1 QB 585, Mellor J had held that there is no authority for implying a general term against a sub-pledge to the extent of the pledgee`s interest, un......
Request a trial to view additional results