Donnelly v Joyce

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1973
Year1973
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
184 cases
  • Hunt v Severs
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 April 1994
    ...in any case where the need has apparently been 'met' by unpaid carers." 9 In the Court of Appeal the judgment of Megaw L.J. in Donnelly v. Joyce [1974] Q.B. 454 again provided the main foundation for the court's reasoning. Having examined this and other authorities, Sir Thomas Bingham M.R.,......
  • Lim Xueru and Another v Lim Kai Meng
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 16 October 1992
    ... ... This question raises an interesting point of law. The plaintiffs` argument is founded on Donnelly v Joyce which was followed in Ang Eng Lee & Anor v Lim Lye Soon .But first let me set out the plaintiffs` contention. It is that the agreed special ... ...
  • Housecroft v Burnett
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Coleman v Macdonald
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 24 September 1979
    ...London Passenger Transp. Bd., [1948] 2 All E.R. 779; (1948), 64 T.L.R. 269, observations of Denning J. applied. (11) Donnelly v. Joyce, [1974] Q.B. 454; [1973] 3 All E.R. 475, applied. (12) Gage v. King, [1961] 1 Q.B. 188; [1960] 3 All E.R. 62, observations of Diplock J. applied. (13) Graha......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...position in the labour market as an “existing loss”. 131 [2016] SGHC 129. 132 [2004] SGHC 147 at [7]. 133 Cap 91A, S 569/2012. 134 [1974] QB 454. 135 Donnelly v Joyce [1974] QB 454, applied in Ang Eng Lee v Lim Lye Soon [1985–1986] SLR(R) 931. 136 See Hunt v Severs [1994] 2 AC 350. 137 [201......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...This head of damage was treated as the plaintiff's reasonable cost of meeting his needs due to the defendant's tort: Donnelly v Joyce[1974] QB 454; Lee Wei Kong v Ng Siok Tong[2012] 2 SLR 85 at [53]; Kuan Kian Seng v Wong Choon Keh[1995] SGHC 43. As a result of the plaintiff's accident, his......
  • The Standardisation of Tort Damages
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 84-1, January 2021
    • 1 January 2021
    ...consequential economic loss in English law, see for example the recovery of cost of carerendered gratuitously:Donnelly vJoyce [1974] QB 454,462; Burrows,n 5 above,240-243; McGregoron Damages n 5 above,§§40-225–40-232.11 D.Ipp,Review of the Law of Negligence. Final Report (Canberra: Commonwe......
  • COLLATERAL BENEFITS: DEFENDING THE CAUSAL RATIONALE.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 76 No. 1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...at 646. (148) Ratych, supra note 50 at 965, McLachlin J. (149) Parry, supra note 17 at 15, Lord Reid. (150) See Donnelly v Joyce (1973), [1974] QB 454 at 463, [ 1973] 3 All ER 475 (CA); The Perene, supra note 26 at 3-4, Newcombe (151) See Sylvester v British Columbia, [1997] 2 SCR 315 at pa......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT