Donohue v Armco Inc. and Others
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | LORD BINGHAM OF CORNHILL,LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN,LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD HOBHOUSE OF WOODBOROUGH,LORD SCOTT OF FOSCOTE |
| Judgment Date | 13 December 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | [2001] UKHL 64 |
| Date | 13 December 2001 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
316 cases
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v K.I. Holdings Company Ltd and Another
...gateway applies, and clause 10 provides for the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts, which creates (as is clear from e.g. Donohue v Armco Inc [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep 425 HL at 433 per Lord Bingham) an even stronger presumption than in the case of a provision for non-exclusive jurisdi......
-
The Republic of Angola (2) (Acting by and Through the Ministry of Finance of Angola) v Perfectbit Ltd
...as in the present case). 115 As to the former, the applicable principle is well-established, and was set out by the House of Lords in Donohue v Armco Inc [2001] UKHL 64, [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep 119. As recognised in that case by Lord Bingham at paragraph [24]: “… the general rule is clear: wh......
-
Ecom Agroindustrial Corporation Ltd v Mosharaf Composite Textile Mill Ltd
...is not obliged to exercise any particular caution before granting the injunction — see The Angelic Grace [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87, 96; Donohue v Armco [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep 425 (HL) para 24 (Lord Bingham), 53 (Lord Scott); Raphael, The Anti-Suit Injunction (2008) para 7.09. 20 Although anti......
-
Euromark Ltd v Smash Enterprises Pty Ltd
...enforced ( Section 7 below)? 5 THE LAW 5.1 "Strong Reasons" 12 The starting point is the articulation of the 'strong reasons' test in Donohue v Armco Inc [2001] UKHL 54 (at paragraph 24) by Lord Bingham. He said: "If contracting parties agree to give a particular court exclusive jurisdictio......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Jurisdictional Developments In The DIFC Courts
...by Brandon J in the Eleftheria [1969] 1 Lloyds Rep 237, a judgment approved and adopted by the House of Lords in Donoghue -v- Armco [2002] 1 Lloyds Rep 425. Although the Court felt that the natural forum for the claims against Sarasin Switzerland was "certainly" in Switzerland, it made the ......
-
Anti-Suit Injunction Granted By Grand Court To Restrain Cayman Liquidators From Continuing New York Litigation
...section...". No "strong reasons" to refuse grant of an injunction In accordance with the House of Lords decision in Donohue v Armco Inc [2001] UKHL 64, the court will ordinarily restrain proceedings in foreign courts commenced in breach of arbitration or exclusive jurisdiction clauses unles......
-
Anti-Suit Injunction Granted By Grand Court To Restrain Cayman Liquidators From Continuing New York Litigation
...section...". No "strong reasons" to refuse grant of an injunction In accordance with the House of Lords decision in Donohue v Armco Inc [2001] UKHL 64, the court will ordinarily restrain proceedings in foreign courts commenced in breach of arbitration or exclusive jurisdiction clauses unles......
18 books & journal articles
-
MEDIATION CLAUSES
...Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v Lee Kui Jak [1987] AC 871; Airbus Industrie GIE v Patel [1999] 1 AC 119; Donohue v Armco [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep 425; Turner v Grovit [2002] 1 WLR 107; Turner v Grovit [2004] ECR I-3565; OT Africa Line Ltd v Magic Sportswear Corp [2005] 2 Lloyd's Rep 170. ......
-
THE EFFECTIVE REACH OF CHOICE OF LAW AGREEMENTS
...governed by the common law. 9 See, for example, The Hyundai Fortune[2004] 4 SLR 548 (CA). 10 See, for example, Donohue v Armco Inc[2002] 1 All ER 749, [2001] UKHL 64 at [24] and [53]; Regalindo Resources Pte Ltd v Seatrek Trans Pte Ltd[2008] SGHC 74 at [11]. 11 http://www.hcch.net/index_en.......
-
Cross‐border asset protection: an offshore perspective
...731 F2d 909, 926.27 (DCCir)(1984).(65) The most recent statement to that eect was Lord Binghamin Donohue v ArmCo. Inc and Others [2002] 1 All ER 749, HLciting Lord Go in SNI Aerospatiale,ibid.(66) There may be a cause of action if in breach of contract aparty commences proceedings: see Yo......
-
Table of cases
...345 Donohue v. Armco Inc. (2001), [2002] 1 All E.R. 749, [2001] UKHL 64........... 153 Dow Jones & Company Inc. v. Gutnick (2002), 210 C.L.R. 575, [2002] HCA 56............................................................................... 79, 264, 265 Downton v. Royal Trust Co. (1972), [19......
Request a trial to view additional results