Dormer v Ward
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Court | Court of Appeal |
Date | 1901 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Prescott (formerly Fellowes) v Fellowes
...argued that a settlement had come to on end at the moment of the divorce in the one case and after the divorce in the other. See Dormer (otherwise Ward) v. Ward, 1901 Probate, page 20; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 1943 Probate, page 7). 5 The first clause of the deed reads AS follows: "Lady Preacott w......
-
Nr (Petitioner) v AB (1St Respondent) Bco Ltd (2Nd Respondent) Mb (3Rd Respondent) Lb (4Th Respondent)
...that the court's power does not extend to property which is not part of the settled property. In some cases, of which Dormer v Ward [1901] P 20 is an example, nice questions may arise over whether property is or is not brought into the settlement." 103 A more recent example of the exercise ......
-
Dr v Gr (1st Respondent) A.B.C Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd (2nd Respondent) Oakleaf Ltd (3rd Respondent) Deerpark Enterprise Centre Ltd (4th Respondent) Summer Ltd (5th Respondent) Summer International Ltd (6th Respondent)
...the settlement." He pointed out that a settlement which affects a property does not necessarily capture all of that property. Thus in Dormer v Ward [1901] P 20 one of the assets included in the marriage settlement was a jointure rent-charge charged on certain specified hereditaments. A join......
-
Ben Hashem v Al Shayif
...that the ‘marriage’ was bigamous is not, of itself, any obstacle to the exercise by the court of its powers under section 24(1)(c): see Dormer v Ward [1901] P 20. As Miss Parker correctly puts it, referring to Rayden and Jackson on Divorce and Family Matters, ed 18, Vol 1(1) at para 16.180......
Request a trial to view additional results