Dove v Banhams Patent Locks Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Moore (D. W.) & Company Ltd v Ferrier
...case and Baker's case been undermined, or reduced, by the reasoning of the House of Lords in Pirelli? 39In Dove v. Banham, (1983) 1 Weekly Law Reports, 1436, Mr. Justice Hodgson expressed the view that it was at any rate possible that Forster v. Outred could no longer stand since Pirelli's......
-
Zim Properties Ltd v Proctor
...Outred & Co. WLR[1982] 1 W.L.R. 86, and to what Hodgson J. said about Forster v. Outred & Co. in Dove v. Banhams Patent Locks Ltd. WLR[1983] 1 W.L.R. 1436, at p.1445. I also took the opportunity of rereading the judgment that the Court of Appeal delivered on 12 May 1982, in the unreported c......
-
URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd
...of special rules. Another advantage would be to avoid the kind of contortions that are exemplified by decisions such as Dove [ Dove v Banhams Patent Locks Ltd [1983] 1 W.L.R. 1436] and Harriss. I see the great force of the reasoning of Deane J. Similar reasoning was expressed by the Privy ......
- London Congregational Union Inc. v Harriss & Harriss
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Defects
...Congregational Union Inc v Harriss & Harriss [1988] 1 All ER 15 at 32, per Sir Denys Buckley. See also Dove v Banhams Patent Locks Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 1436 and Lavers, “Defects in construction: recent developments in the law relating to limitation of actions” (1987) 29 Malaya Law Review 18 at ......