Doyle v Falconer
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1865 |
Date | 1865 |
Year | 1865 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Jeyaretnam JB v Attorney General
... ... conferred upon a supreme legislative assembly of a colony, or settlement, by the introduction of the common law of England into the colony.In Doyle v Falconer 16 ER 293, it was held that the legislative assembly of Dominica did not possess the power of punishing a contempt, though committed in ... ...
-
[1] Hon. Mark Brantley (Leader of the Opposition) [2] Hon. Eugene Hamilton [3] Hon. Shawn Richards [4] Hon. Vance Armory [5] Hon. Sam Condor [6] Hon. Timothy Harris Claimants/Respondents v [1] Hon. Curtis Martin (Speaker of the National Assembly) [2] Hon. Denzil Douglas (Prime Minister) [3] Hon. Dr. Asim Martin (Deputy Prime Minister) [4] Hon. Patrice Nisbett [5] Hon. Marcella Liburd [6] Hon. Glen Phillip [7] Hon. Richard Skerrit [8] Hon. Nigel Carty [9] Hon. Jason Hamilton [10] Attorney General of St. Chrisptopher and Nevis Defendants/Applicants [ECSC]
...enable them to carry out their functions under the colonial Constitution. ( Keilly v Carson (1842) 4 Moo P.C. (63). Doyle v Falconer (1866) LR. 1 PC 328) 81 The colonial Constitution has been replaced with the Independence Constitution that declares that it is the supreme law of the State, ......
-
Rediffusion (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney General of Hong Kong
...394; [1932] A.C. 526, P.C. Barton v. Taylor (1886) App.Cas. 197, P.C. Clayton v. Heffron (1960) 105 C.L.R. 214. Doyle v. Faulkner (1866) L.R. 1 P.C. 328, P.C Dyson v. Attorney-General [1911] 1 K.B. 410, C.A. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Hannay & Co. [1915] 2 K.B. 536, C.A. Hughes & Val......
-
1. Jane Laporte and Another v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
...in which attendees originally entitled to be present at meetings had thereafter been expelled for disruptive behaviour. 30 In Doyle v. Falconer (1866) L.R. 1 P.C. 328, the Privy Council was concerned with the issue as to whether or not a colonial legislative house had power to punish one of......
Request a trial to view additional results