DPP v Lamb

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Date1941
Year1941

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • DPP v Cawley
    • Ireland
    • Central Criminal Court (Ireland)
    • 14 June 2002
    ...85. Director of Public Prosecutions (Ivers) v. Murphy [1999] 1 I.R. 98; [1999] 1 I.L.R.M. 46. Director of Public Prosecutions v. Lamb [1941] 2 K.B. 89; [1941] 2 All E.R. 499; 110 L.J.K.B. 480; 165 L.T. 59; 105 J.P. 251; 57 T.L.R. 449; 39 L.G.R. 170. Dr. Bonham's Case (1610) 8 Co. Rep. 114. ......
  • Re Barretto
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 October 1993
    ...would not have been different once the defendant had under the existing law acquired a complete (albeit technical) answer to the charge. 29 In Lamb the defendants were said to have infringed a Defence Regulation during a period throughout which the same penalty was prescribed. After that pe......
  • Public Prosecutor v Peter Tham Wing Fai
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 April 1989
    ... ... , or creates fresh liabilities with regard to persons, or creates or imposes obligations on persons and thereby alters the law, it ought not be held to be retroactive in its operation unless the words are clear, precise and quite free from ambiguity (see Director of Public Prosecutions v Lamb [1941] 2 All ER 499).The punishment for the offences which the respondent was convicted is prescribed in s 467 of the Penal Code. There has been no change in the punishment prescribed in s 467 by the amendments. The amending statutes have not increased the penalties for the offences, which the ... ...
  • Carter-Fea v Graham
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free