DPP v Ward

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date24 March 1997
Date24 March 1997
CourtDivisional Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Kennedy v Crown Prosecution Service
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 6 November 2002
    ...the Code, to change or affect in any way the section 8 procedure as considered in the line of cases to which I have referred." 16 In DPP v Ward [1999] RTR 11 a motorist aged 17 who had asked to see a solicitor gave specimens of breath but the analysis of the lower specimen was such that he ......
  • DPP v Kennedy [Qbd, 24/10/2003]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 24 October 2003
    ...as to the exclusion of the evidence as to what happened at the police station pursuant to section 78, he reminds us of the decision in DPP v Carey (1970) AC 1072, decided at a time when a valid arrest was still a condition precedent to a conviction under what is now section 5. In that case,......
  • R DPP v BRYCHAN GETHIN John Evans
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 December 2002
    ...reasonable excuse. In my judgment, the submissions made on behalf of the prosecution are well-founded." 12 Mr Thomas next relies on DPP v Ward [1999] RTR 11. In particular, the judgment of Brooke LJ and the following passage: "This court in Billington has made it quite clear that the usual ......
  • R (DPP) v Preston
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 March 2003
    ...so on the basis of section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Having reviewed the authorities, including the case of DPP v Ward [1999] RTR 11, which is also relied upon by the appellant in this case, Maurice Kay J reached the following conclusion: "In my judgment, there is a c......
  • Get Started for Free