DR Insurance Company v Central National Insurance Company of Omaha [QBD (Comm)]

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
JudgeMartin Moore-Bick
Judgment Date29 September 1995
Date29 September 1995

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Faraday Reinsurance Company Ltd v Howden North America Inc. and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 1 November 2011
    ...be shown that a solid practical benefit would ensue". Similar caution was shown in DR Insurance Co v Central National Insurance Co [1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 74 at 84 (although this was in part because the claimant in the English proceedings was relying on the illegality of its corporate predec......
  • Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Glasgow City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 October 1997
    ...were regarded as being contractual in that case. 107Mr. Pollock also relied on the judgment of Mr. Moore-Bick Q.C. in DR Insurance Co. v. Central National Insurance Co. [1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 74 where the learned Deputy Judge was considering the words of Order 11 Rule 1(1)(d) of the Rules o......
  • Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlef Von Appen GmbH v Wiener Allianz Versicherungs AG
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 April 1997
    ... ... AG of Vienna (whom I will call the Insurance Company) and Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH of ... Finnish Marine Insurance v Protective National Insurance [1991] QB 1078 ... Mr Hamilton said at ... by Mr Moore-B ick QC in DR Insurance v Central National Insurance [1996] 1 Lloyds 74 ... In that ... ...
  • Ace European Ltd and Others v Howden Group Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 17 September 2012
    ...of law whether by virtue of ArtArt 3 (1) the Rome Convention or SchSchedule 3A of the Insurance Contracts Act 1982ee DR Insurance Co v Central National Insurance Co [1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep 74; Gan v Tai Ping [1999] Lloyd's Rep. IR 472 and Stonebridge Underwriting Ltd v Ontario Municipal Insur......
  • Get Started for Free