DR Insurance Company v Central National Insurance Company of Omaha [QBD (Comm)]

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMartin Moore-Bick
Judgment Date29 September 1995
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
Date29 September 1995
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Faraday Reinsurance Company Ltd v Howden North America Inc. and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 1 November 2011
    ...is claimed against him, unless it can be shown that a solid practical benefit would ensue". Similar caution was shown in DR Insurance Co v Central National Insurance Co [1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 74 at 84 (although this was in part because the claimant in the English proceedings was relying on ......
  • Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Glasgow City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 October 1997
    ...were regarded as being contractual in that case. 107Mr. Pollock also relied on the judgment of Mr. Moore-Bick Q.C. in DR Insurance Co. v. Central National Insurance Co. [1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 74 where the learned Deputy Judge was considering the words of Order 11 Rule 1(1)(d) of the Rules o......
  • Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlef Von Appen GmbH v Wiener Allianz Versicherungs AG
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 April 1997
    ... ... AG of Vienna (whom I will call the Insurance Company) and Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH of ... Finnish Marine Insurance v Protective National Insurance [1991] QB 1078 ... Mr Hamilton said at ... by Mr Moore-B ick QC in DR Insurance v Central National Insurance [1996] 1 Lloyds 74 ... In that ... ...
  • Ace European Ltd and Others v Howden Group Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 17 September 2012
    ...of law whether by virtue of Art 3 (1) of the Rome Convention or Schedule 3A of the Insurance Contracts Act 1982; see DR Insurance Co v Central National Insurance Co [1996] 1 Lloyd's Rep 74; Gan v Tai Ping [1999] Lloyd's Rep. IR 472 and Stonebridge Underwriting Ltd v Ontario Municipal Insur......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT