Duer v Frazer
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2001 |
Year | 2001 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
Execution - Foreign judgment - Writ of execution - Application for permission to issue writ of execution more than six years after judgment registered - Exercise of court's discretion -
In March 1984 the claimant obtained judgment against the defendant in proceedings in Germany. That judgment, which remained enforceable in Germany for 30 years after it was given, was duly registered in England four months later. Inquiry agents hired by the claimant discovered that the defendant was living on a small Caribbean island, on which he owned a small plot of land, and one of their representatives met the defendant in 1989. No further steps were taken to enforce the judgment until 1994 when the claimant hired new inquiry agents. Only in 1997 did the defendant become aware that the claimant was still seeking to pursue execution of the judgment. The claimant applied to the court for permission to issue execution of the judgment pursuant to RSC Ord 46, r 2 since more than six years had elapsed since the date of the judgment. Permission was granted at a without notice hearing, but was subsequently discharged on the defendant's application.
On the claimant's appeal—
Held, dismissing the appeal, that the court would only extend time beyond the six-year period provided for by RSC Ord 46, r 2 where it was demonstrably just so to do; that the burden of proof to establish that it was just to do so rested on the judgment creditor; that, whilst every application turned on its own facts, the court would have regard to the reasons given for not issuing judgment during the initial six-year period and to any prejudice suffered by the judgment debtor as a result of the delay, including in particular any change of position by him; that for the purposes of RSC Ord 46, r 2 there was no reason to treat the judgment of a foreign court which had been registered in England any differently from that of an English court; and that since the claimant had failed to satisfy the court that the interests of justice required it to exercise its discretion to extend time the master's order would be affirmed (see post, pp 925B–F, 926G).
The following cases are referred to in the judgment:
BP Properties Ltd v Buckler [
Lamb (W T) & Sons v Rider [
Lougher v Donovan [
Lowsley v Forbes (t/a L E Design Services) [
National Westminster Bank plc v Powney [
The following additional case was cited in argument:
Evans v Bartlam [
APPEAL from Master Hodgson
By notice of appeal dated 9 February 2000 the claimant, Anne-Margaret Duer, appealed from the order of Master Hodgson dated 3 February 2000 setting aside, on the application of the defendant, Peter Nigel Frazer, the further writ of execution issued on the without notice application of the claimant by Master Hodgson on 19 April 1999 in respect of the judgment in favour of the claimant entered by the Higher Hanseatic Regional Court of Hamburg on 20 March 1984 and registered in England by order of Master Topley dated 24 July 1984.
The appeal was heard in private but judgment was given in open court.
The facts are stated in the judgment.
Catherine Newman QC and Richard Morgan for the claimant.
Jonathan Harvey for the defendant.
19 April. The following judgment was handed down.
EVANS-LOMBE J
1 This is an appeal against the order of Master Hodgson of 3 February 2000 whereby he discharged his order made without notice giving the claimant permission to issue execution to enforce a judgment dated 20 March 1984 of the Higher Hanseatic Regional Court of Hamburg (to which I will refer as “the German judgment”) against the defendant registered pursuant to the order of Master Topley made on 24 July 1984.
2 The background facts from which the issues in this appeal arise are as follows. The claimant is a German national. The defendant is a former British army officer. In late 1970 the claimant and the defendant started an antiques business in Germany. They later formed a close relationship. It is the claimant's case that in order to assist the defendant to establish the business she advanced to the defendant a loan of DM250,000. It is her case that when the relationship broke up and the antiques business was liquidated she was never repaid that sum. In 1983 she commenced proceedings in the German courts against the defendant. Initially those proceedings failed but succeeded on appeal when judgment was entered for the claimant in the Higher Hanseatic Regional Court of Hamburg on 20 March 1984. The defendant's appeal from that judgment to the Federal High Court was summarily dismissed.
3 After the dissolution of the antiques business the defendant went to live on a property owned by him in Devon. His main source of income was an army pension. On 24 July 1984 on the application of the claimant, the German judgment was registered in England by order of Master Topley pursuant to the
4 On 1 July 1986 a plot of land on Nevis was vested in the defendant “as trustee” by a company called North Shore Estates Ltd of which he was a small shareholder. The defendant's explanation for this transaction is set out in his most recent witness statement. It is the defendant's case that at this time he formed a partnership with a prominent citizen of the island to develop a plot of land on which the defendant wished to build a house for himself. The defendant's partner had funds which would have enabled them to build other houses on the site. The defendant's name appeared on the title to the land as trustee for the purpose of this partnership and also for the purpose of avoiding the payment of a local “alien land holding tax” which would otherwise have been payable. The defendant paid...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dennis Louisy qua Administrator of the Estate of the late Adelina Louisy as appears by Probate No.51 of 2000 Appellant v [1] Dolphius Doxay [2] Lias Coffin [3] Lennards Mc Farlane [4] Baby Pinnel [5] Inez Mc Farlane [6] Fafa Coffin [7] Claudia Mc Farlane [8] Claudius Mc Farlane [9] Merita Coffin [10] Iris Mc Farlane [11] Oliver Mc Farlane [12] Arnold Amos [13] Joseph (alias Andess) Mc Farlane [14] Albert Blanchard Respondents [ECSC]
...the efforts made by the appellant to enforce rights given by the judgment of 19915. 16 Both sides referred to the case ofDuer v Frazer [2001] 1 WLR 9196, Counsel for the appellant in order to distinguish it and Counsel for the respondents to support the judgment. The learned trial judge und......
-
Good Challenger Navegante SA v Metalexportimport SA
...entirely agree. 106 The judge directed himself in accordance with the principles adopted under RSC Order 46 rule 2(1) by Evans-Lombe J in Duer v Frazer [2001] 1 All ER 249 and by this court in Patel v Singh [2002] EWCA 1938, although Patel v Singh had only recently been decided and I think......
-
The Society of Lloyds and Jean Pierre Longtin
...judgment. It is for Lloyd's to show that the test for giving leave is satisfied, rather than on Judge Longtin to show that it was not: Duer v Frazer [2001] 1 WLR 919, paragraph 25. b. As a matter of principle the court will not generally extend time beyond 6 years and, ordinarily, the lapse......
-
Strategic Technologies Pte Ltd v Procurement Bureau of the Republic of China Ministry of National Defence
...that requiring the applicant to show that it would be demonstrably just to grant permission (as explained by Evans-Lombe J in Duer v Frazer [2001] 1 WLR 919) also reflected the requirement of taking something out of the ordinary. Given that the circumstances of this case are somewhat unusu......
-
FOREIGN LAW IN DOMESTIC COURTS
...Act (Cap 264, 1985 Rev Ed). 94[2009] 2 SLR(R) 166. 95Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport-SDPR[2008] EWHC 801 (Comm). 96Duer v Frazer[2001] 1 WLR 919 and The Society of Lloyd's v Jean Pierre Longtin[2005] EWHC 2491 (Comm). 97[2012] EWCA Civ 980. 98[2012] EWCA Civ 1624. 99Howden North Ameri......
-
Practical Problems Regarding the Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments
...EWCA Civ 1668 (24 Nov 2003) in par 107.70 National Westminster Bank plc v Powney & Others [1991] Ch 339 (CA) at 361.71 Duer v Frazer [2001] 1 WLR 919 (QB) at 925. In this case, over fi fteen years had lapsed since the relevant foreign judgment had been registered in England and the Court d......