Dunn v R

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1896
Date1896

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
56 cases
  • Government of Pahang; Haji Ariffin
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
  • Riordan v War Office (Note)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...of State for the Colonies [1953] 2 Q.B. 482, 497; [1953] 3 W.L.R. 331; [1953] 2 All E.R. 490; and Dunn v. The Queen [1896] 1 Q.B. 116; 12 T.L.R. 101 (2) That it was immaterial that the regulations purported to oust the Crown's right to dispense with the plaintiff's services at pleasure as t......
  • The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Thomas
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 19 January 1979
    ...the rule of dismissibility at pleasure, that is to say, had abrogated the implied term of the respondents employment with the Crown. 31 In Dunn v. Reg [1896] 1 Q.B. 116 Kay, L.J. in reference to the implied term likened the position of a civil servant to that of a military officer and said:......
  • Attorney General v Thomas
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1962 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...& M.K.B. 25; 4 L.J.K.B. 10; 111 E.R. 7. 213 Dunn v. The Queen (1896) 1 Q.B. 16; 65 L.J. Q.B. 279; 73 L.T..695; 60 J.P. 117; 44 W.R. 243, 12 T.L.R. 101; 40 Sol. Jo. 129. 86 Dyson v. Attorney-General (1911) 1 K.B. 410; 81 L.J.K.B 217; 105 L.T. 753; 27 T.L.R. 143; 55 Sol. Jo. 168. 86 Edokpalor......
  • Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...Department; Ex parte Nangle [1992] 1 All ER 897; W Ivor Jennings, The Law and the Constitution (3rd ed, 1948) 179–83. 265 See Dunn v R [1896] 1 QB 116; Fletcher v Nott (1938) 60 CLR 55, 67; John Mitchell, The Contracts of Public Authorities (1954) 32–52; Enid Campbell, 'Termination of Appoi......
  • Access to the Courts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ontario Public Service Employment and Labour Law - Second Edition
    • 27 February 2024
    ...others whose tenure of oice is governed by statute, all servants and oicers of the Crown hold oice at pleasure.” 17 Dunn v The Queen , [1896] 1 QB 116 at 120 [ Dunn ]. 18 Mills v Alberta , [1986] 5 WWR 567 (Alta CA) at 570. 19 Dunn , above note 17. 20 Reilly v The King , 1933 CanLII 379 (UK......