Dwyer v Mansfield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1946
Year1946
CourtKing's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Fabbri v Italy
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Hubbard v Pitt
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 May 1975
    ...of the Attorney-General: or by any adjoining occupier who suffered particular damage — see Harper v. Haden (1933) Ch. 298 at page 304: Doya v. Mansfield (1946) Q.B. 437. But there was nothing in the nature of a public nuisance here. No crowds collected. No queues were formed. No obstructio......
  • Intercape Ferreira Mainliner (Pty) Ltd and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others
    • South Africa
    • 24 June 2009
    ...ER 52 (CA): referred to Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994] 1 All ER 53 (HL): referred to Dwyer v Mansfield [1946] 2 All ER 247 (KB): referred to D Lyons, Sons & Co v Gulliver [1914] 1 Ch 631 (CA): referred Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan and Others [1940] AC 880 ([......
  • Intercape Ferreira Mainliner (Pty) Ltd and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others
    • South Africa
    • Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
    • 24 June 2009
    ...obstructing of public areas will not be regarded as an unlawful nuisance to neighbours (for an English example, see Dwyer v Mansfield [1946] 2 All ER 247 E [164] I was urged by Mr Albertus to take into account that the Montreal enclave is an industrial area and that the applicants could not......
  • Get Started for Free