Dyson v Attorney General
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1911 |
| Date | 1911 |
| Year | 1911 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
448 cases
- Alliance (Malaya) Engineering Company Sdn Bhd v San Development Sdn Bhd
-
McKay v Essex Area Health Authority
...London & North Western Railway Co., (1892) 3 Chancery, 277, per Lord Justice Lindley: "obviously and almost incontestably bad": Dyson v. Attorney-General, (1911) 1 King's Bench, 419, per Lord Justice Fletcher-Moulton; "unarguable": Nagle v. Feilden, (1966) 2 Queen's Bench, 651, per Lord......
-
Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers
...present proceedings do not possess the required characteristic. The case on which so much reliance was placed by the plaintiff� Dyson v. Attorney-General [1912] 1 Ch. 158, was one where a person was affected in his private rights: if the issue of the form had been proceeded with, and a p......
- Royal Bank of Canada v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (August 28 – September 1)
...Ministry of Defence, [2003] UKHL 4, [2003] 1 A.C. 1163, M. v. Home Office, [1993] UKHL 5, [1994] 1 A.C. 377, Dyson v. Attorney-General, [1911] 1 K.B. 410 (Eng. & Wales C.A.), Slark (Litigation Guardian of) v. Ontario, 2010 ONSC 1726, Canada v. Thouin, 2017 SCC 46, Mitchell v. Peguis Indian ......
23 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1965
...137 Draper v. Trist and others (1939) 3 All E.R. 513. ............................................... 137 Dyson v. Attorney-General (1911) 1 K.B. 410. ................................................... 127 Eaton v. Daines (1894) W.N. 32 ...........................................................
-
Action
...remedies and therefore subject to all equitable defences. Courts of Equity in England have since the case of Dyson v. Attorney-General (1911) 1 K.B. 410; (1912) 1 Ch. 158 allowed an ordinary citizen who sought to assert a public right, which is owed to the public at large to apply for that ......
-
Preliminary Sections
...(1896) 1 Q.B. 16; 65 L.J. Q.B. 279; 73 L.T..695; 60 J.P. 117; 44 W.R. 243, 12 T.L.R. 101; 40 Sol. Jo. 129. 86 Dyson v. Attorney-General (1911) 1 K.B. 410; 81 L.J.K.B 217; 105 L.T. 753; 27 T.L.R. 143; 55 Sol. Jo. 168. 86 Edokpalor v. Idehen, (1961) W.N.L.R. 11. 390 Ellis (John T.) Ltd. v. Hi......
-
Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
...above n 17, 210–11, 296–7. 145 Taylor v AG (1834) 8 Sim 413; 59 ER 164; Clayton v AG (1834) 1 Coop temp Cott 87; 47 ER 766; Dyson v AG [1911] 1 KB 410; R v Employment Secretary; Ex parte EOC [1995] 1 AC 1, 2005 Judicial Development of Public Law 21 __________________________________________......
Request a trial to view additional results