Eagil Trust Company Ltd v Pigott-Brown
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1985 |
| Date | 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
243 cases
-
Derbyshire County Council v High Peak Magistrates' Court Ms Kate Marlow (Interested Party)
...138, in which I made reference to the general rule that there is no obligation to give reasons for a decision on costs, citing Eagil Trust Co v Pigott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119 and, in particular, a passage from Griffiths LJ's judgment at 122A. It seems to me very doubtful whether that deci......
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
...... [1979] 1 Ch.250 . In that case the allegation was that a limited company had itself given two of its three directors financial aid to buy its own ... the defendant directors were guilty of misfeasance and breach of trust. At first instance and at the close of the case for the plaintiff ......
-
Battista v Bassano
...clear. In the English case, this court adopted with approval the following observations of Griffiths LJ in the earlier case of Eagil Trust Co Ltd v Piggott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119, 122. Griffiths LJ said: “I cannot stress too strongly that there is no duty on a judge in giving his reason......
-
Administrator General of Jamaica (Administrator Estate Alvin Augustus Cargill - deceased) v Vivian Plowright and Ferdinand Murphy
...below that an essential part of the judicial function is the delivery of reasons for their decision. A citation from Eagil Trust Co Ltd v Piggott-Brown and another [1985] 3 All ER 119 emphasises the point. At page 122, Griffiths LJ, as he then was said: "The next general observation I ough......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The principle of open justice and the judicial duty to give public reasons.
...Tribunal; Ex parte Khan (Mahmud) [1983] QB 790, 794-5 (Lord Lane CJ); Hoey v Hoey [1984] 1 WLR 464; Eagil Trust Co Ltd v Pigott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119; R v Harrow Crown Court; Exporte Dave [1994] 1 WLR 98, 101-7 (Pill J for Kennedy LJ and Pill J); Coleman v Dunlop Ltd [1998] PIQR 398; Ab......
-
The Bowman Review of the Court of Appeal
...judge where it was heard by a Circuitjudge. Appeals should not be by way of a complete re-hearing.57 Eagil Trust Co vPiggott-Brown [1985] 3 All ER 119, 121 per Griffiths LJ; Practice Direction [1990]3 All ER 981; RG Carter Ltd vClarke [1990] 2 All ER 209; Daisystar Ltd vTown & Building Soci......