East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1961
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
  • Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Glancr‚ Teo. v Cafferkey (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 April 2004
    ...QUARRIES & ORS 1981 ILRM 23 MONAGHAN CO COUNCIL V BROGAN 1987 IR 333 EAST BARNET URBAN DISTRICT CO V BRITISH TRANSPORT COMMISSION 1962 2 QB 484 LOCAL GOVT (PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT) ACT 1963 S28(6) READYMIX (EIRE) LTD V DUBLIN CO COUNCIL UNREP SUPREME 30.7.1974 MCMAHON V DUBLIN CORPORATION......
  • Butler v Dublin Corporation
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 January 1999
    ...is made under s. 27. No doubt, as Lord Parker C.J. pointed out in East Barnet Urban District Council .v. British Transport Commission [1962] 2 Q.B.484, "material" in this context means "material for planning purposes". Whether or not it is so material must be determined by the court as a m......
  • R (on the application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Forest of Dean District Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • Invalid date
    ...the other members of the appellate committee agreed. He referred at p 669 to the statement by Lord Parker CJ in East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484, at p 491, that when considering whether there has been a change of use of land “what is really ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Development Control
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...In other words, the character of the land was unchanged. See also East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484, where there had been no material change of use, as the land had always been used as a storage and transport depot, even though what was stored......
  • Development Control
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part VI. Elements of planning law
    • 30 August 2016
    ...In other words, the character of the land was unchanged. See also East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484, where there had been no material change of use as the land had always been used as a storage and transport depot even though what was stored a......
  • Permitted Development
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...of planning permission by a development order. 15 GPDO, art 3(4). East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484; Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578; Adur District Council v Secretary of State for Environment, T......
  • Permitted Development
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Restrictions on the Use of Land Part VI. Elements of planning law
    • 30 August 2016
    ...planning permission by a development order. 14 2015 Order, art 3(4). East Barnet Urban District Council v British Transport Commission [1962] 2 QB 484; Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578; Adur District Council v Secretary of State for Environment......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT