Eastbourne Corporation v Fortes Ice Cream Parlour (1955) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Date | 1958 |
| Year | 1958 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
Guildford Rural District Council v Fortescue; Guildford Rural District Council v Penny
...taken, by way of Case Stated, to the Divisional Court, the present Appellants conceded before that Court that its recent decision in the Eastbourne case (reported In 1953 2 Queen's Bench, page 41) must cover this case also, and they submitted accordingly to an Order allowing the Council's a......
-
Mounsdon v Weymouth and Melcombe Regis Borough Council
... ... Dicta of Lord Evershed M.R. in Eastbourne Corporation v. Fortes Ice Cream Parlour (1955) ... ...
-
Miller-Mead v Minister of Housing and Local Government
... ... Mr Miller-Mead bought the freeehold in 1955 and he seems to have acted on this temporary ... was not in law development, as in Eastbourne v. Fortes, 1958 , 2 Queen's Bench, p. 4l, then ... ...
-
Freda Margurita Jeary (Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Richard Jeary, deceased) (Plaintiff) (Appellant) Chailey Rural District Council and East Sussex Country Council (Defendants) (Respondents)
...placed in his path by the judgments of this Court in Eastbourne Corporation v. Forte's Ice Cream Parlours 1955 Limited, 1959 2 Queen's Bench, 92. His argument as to the grounds (c) to (e) - ground (b) being, on any view, irrelevant for the present purposes - was that ground (c) involves on......
Get Started for Free