Easy Air Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judge | THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LEWISON,Mr. Justice Lewison |
| Judgment Date | 08 April 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch),[2009] EWHC 779 (Ch) |
| Docket Number | Case No: 7MA91089 |
| Date | 08 April 2009 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1203 cases
-
Fiona Lorraine Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc
...upon the following three of the well-known principles which Lewison J, as he then was, summarised in EasyAir Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) at [15] as being applicable to a defendant's application for summary judgment, namely (with her emphasis): ii) “A “realistic” claim is one......
-
Boots UK Ltd v Severn Trent Water Ltd
...whether a real prospect of success has been shown for the purposes of a summary judgment application set out by Lewison J in Easyair Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) at [15]. Issue 1: the statutory meaning of trade effluent 53 There was no dispute between the parties as to the pr......
-
YSL v Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
...claim or issue …” 99 The test to be applied on a summary judgment application is well-known. In EasyAir Limited v. Opal Telecom Limited [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch), [15], Lewison J (as he then was) said: “1. The court must consider whether the [respondent to the summary judgment application] has a......
-
British Telecommunications Plc v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
...There was also no issue as to the correct legal test to apply, namely that summarised by Lewison J in Easyair Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) (“ Easyair”) at [15] in the context of summary judgment. I am content to proceed on that basis, although it is worth bearing in mind that......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Finds Quincecare Duty Is Not Limited To Corporate Customers And Can (In Principle) Extend To Protecting Individuals
...of Appeal as to the correct approach in law to applications for summary judgment, as established in EasyAir Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch). In EasyAir, the court warned against carrying out a mini trial but also recognised that if a short point of law arose which could be decid......
-
Enforcing English Judgments Overseas: Judgment In Default v Summary Judgment
...considered in detail, with reference to the formula set out by Lewison J (as he then was), in Easyair Limited v Opal Telecom Limited [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) at [15]. The Court noted that it was also "standard practice to draw to the judge's attention to any potential defences to the claim that......
