Easy Air Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LEWISON,Mr. Justice Lewison |
| Judgment Date | 08 April 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch),[2009] EWHC 779 (Ch) |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Docket Number | Case No: 7MA91089 |
| Date | 08 April 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
706 cases
-
Fiona Lorraine Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc
...upon the following three of the well-known principles which Lewison J, as he then was, summarised in EasyAir Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) at [15] as being applicable to a defendant's application for summary judgment, namely (with her emphasis): ii) “A “realistic” claim is one......
-
Dr Riccardo Frati v Karen Bowen-Carter
...for summary judgment applications was summarised by Lewison J in Easyair Limited (Trading As Openair) v Opal Telecom Limited [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) at [15] (citations removed): “i) The court must consider whether the claimant has a “realistic” as opposed to a “fanciful” prospect of success. ......
-
Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd
...for summary judgment were conveniently set out by Lewison J (as he then was) in Easyair Ltd (T/A Openair) v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 779 (Ch) in the following terms at para. 15. It has often been cited in the appellate courts with approval, for example in the Court of Appeal's judgment......
-
British Telecommunications Plc v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
...reverse summary judgment. There was also no issue as to the correct legal test to apply, namely that summarised by Lewison J in Easyair Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) (“ Easyair”) at [15] in the context of summary judgment. I am content to proceed on that basis, although it is......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Finds Quincecare Duty Is Not Limited To Corporate Customers And Can (In Principle) Extend To Protecting Individuals
...of Appeal as to the correct approach in law to applications for summary judgment, as established in EasyAir Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch). In EasyAir, the court warned against carrying out a mini trial but also recognised that if a short point of law arose which could be decid......
-
Enforcing English Judgments Overseas: Judgment In Default v Summary Judgment
...considered in detail, with reference to the formula set out by Lewison J (as he then was), in Easyair Limited v Opal Telecom Limited [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch) at [15]. The Court noted that it was also "standard practice to draw to the judge's attention to any potential defences to the claim that......